喜树幼苗的叶悬挂角和叶柄角对不同光环境的响应和适应
Acclimatization of Midrib Angle and Petiole Angle of Camptotheca acuminate Decne to Different Light Regimes in Evergreen Broadleaves Forests
-
摘要: 对比研究了旷地、林窗及林下3种光环境下喜树幼苗叶悬挂角和叶柄角的光响应与适应性,结果表明: (1)在旷地、林窗和林下,光、热等生态因子的差异显著; (2)对于不同的光环境,喜树幼苗的叶悬挂角和叶柄角在旷地的变化幅度最大,林窗下次之,林下最小; ( 3)夏季晴天,在旷地、林窗和林下,喜树幼苗的叶悬挂角与叶柄角分别在16: 00、14: 00和12: 00左右达到“峰”值,叶悬挂角分别约为140°、128°和112°,叶柄角分别约为67°、59°和55°;同时,在3种光环境下,夏季晴天喜树幼苗的叶悬挂角与叶柄角的日变化还表现出一定的协同互作关系,以叶悬挂角和叶柄角同时增大或减小来避开或捕获光辐射,这样即保证了喜树叶片有效避开强光,也确保喜树叶片对适度光辐射的最大利用。以上都是喜树叶片对光的捕获或避开所产生的一种适应效应。Abstract: As a special deciduous broadleaf tree in evergreen broadleaves forests,Camptotheca acuminate is a class Ⅱ protected plant in China.In this paper,the light response and acclimation of leaf inclination in three different light regimes(open,gap and understory) was compared.The results indicated that significant difference among different regimes existed in ecological factors such as PAR,temperature,Vpd and etc.In different light regimes,the extents of diurnal change of midrib angle and petiole angle of Camptotheca acuminate were different,and the highest extent existed in open,the second was in forest gap,and the least was in understory.The midrib angle and the petiole angle appeared at "peak" at 16:00,14:00 and 12:00 respectively in these three light regimes in the sunny day in summer,correspondingly,the values of midrib angle were about 140°,128° and 112°,and the values of petiole angle were about 67°,59° and 55° respectively.In the sunny day,diurnal courses of midrib angle and petiole angle of Camptotheca acuminate showed a certain cooperative relationship to some extents in strong light regimes.In order to effectively avoid strong light or assimilate moderate PAR,seedlings of Camptotheca acuminate increased or cut down its midrib angle and petiole angle at the same time.These leaves movement was a kind of adaptive responses of Camptotheca acuminate to different light regimes.
-
Key words:
- midrib angle
- / petiole angle
- / light regimes
- / acclimatization
- / Camptotheca acuminate Decne
-
[M]. 成都:四川科学技术出版社, 1981: 312～315 [2] 《四川植物志》编辑委员会. 四川植物志(第一卷) [J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版) , 2004, 22 (1) : 36～39 [4] 张显强, 唐金刚, 乙引. 中国喜树资源及可持续开发对策 [J]. 中国林业, 2003(11B) : 33 [6] 付玉杰. 浅谈我国喜树的保护与利用 [J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1992, 28 (4) : 237～243 [8] 许大全,张玉中,张荣铣. 植物光合作用的光抑制 [9] 张亚杰,冯玉龙,冯志立,等. 绒毛番龙眼对生长光强的形态和生理适应 [J]. 植物生理与分子生物学报, 2003, 29 (3) : 206～214 [J]. Plant Physiol, 2001, 125: 1558～1566 [12] Muller P, Lix P, Niyogik K. Non-photochemical quenching: A response to excess light energy [13] Ehleringer J. Foreseth IN. Solar tracking by p lants [J]. Plant CellEnciro, 1980, 210: 1094～1098 [J].生态学报, 2001, 21 (1) : 68～74 [16] 张守仁,高荣孚. 光诱导下杂种无性系叶角和叶绿体运动 [J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25 (2) : 319～324 [18] 姜闯道,高辉远,邹琦,等. 叶角、光呼吸和热耗散协同作用减轻大豆幼叶光抑制 [19] Feng Y L, Cao K F, Feng Z L. Thermal dissipation, leaf rollingand inactivation of PSII reaction centers in Am om um villosum [J]. JTrop Ecol, 2001, 18: 865～876 [J]. Plant Cell Enciro, 1992, 15:7037～7043 [22] KaoW Y, Forseth IN. Diurnal leafmovement, chlorophyll fluorescence and carbon assimilation in soybean grown under different nitrogen and water availabilities [M]. 重庆:西南师范大学出版社, 1988: 345～370 [24] 钟章成. 常绿阔叶林生态学研究 [J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26 (4) : 1047～1056 [26] 郭志华,张旭东,黄玲玲,等. 落叶阔叶树种蒙古栎对林缘不同光环境光和水分的利用 [27] 郭志华,张宏达,李志安,等. 鹅掌楸苗期光合特性的研究 [J].生态学报, 1999, 19 (2) : 164～169 [29] 杨玲,王韶唐. 水分胁迫下的大豆叶取向 [J]. 西北植物学报,1992, 12 (1) : 46～51 [31] Gamon J A, Pcarcy R W. Leaf movements, stress avoidance andphotosynthesis in V itis californica [J]. Oecologia, 1989, 79: 475～481 [33] Forseth IN, Ehleringer J. Solar tracking response to drought in adesert annual [J]. Oecologia, 1980, 44: 159～163 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 3079
- HTML全文浏览量: 225
- PDF下载量: 1506
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
