不同除草剂对长柄扁桃苗圃杂草的防治效果
Prevention Effect of Different Herbicides on Weeds Amygdalus pcdunculata Nursery
-
摘要: 对1年生长柄扁桃苗圃杂草进行了10种除草剂茎叶处理,结果表明:苗圃中的杂草以藜科和禾本科为主,所有除草剂处理对藜科杂草均有防除作用,14%草除灵、10.8%盖草能、12.5%拿扑净、48%排草丹、10.8%高盖+48%排草丹、12.5%拿扑净+48%灭草松、50%异丙隆对禾本科杂草的防效率较高,其中,50%异丙隆的杀草谱最广。48%灭草松和12.5%拿扑净+48%灭草松处理的杂草防效率高,但其对苗木的为害严重。高剂量10.8%盖草能和12.5%拿扑净处理下,杂草防效率达到了68%和56%,长柄扁桃苗未表现出药害症状,二者适用于长柄扁桃苗圃杂草的防治。Abstract: Ten kinds of herbicide with different concentrations were sprayed on the stems and leaves of weeds in a one-year-old Amygdalus pcdunculata nursery. The results showed that the Chenopodiaceae and Poaceae weeds dominated in the nursery, and all the treatments had effect in controlling Chenopodiaceae weeds, while the treatment with the formula of 14% benazolin, 10.8% haloxyfop, 12.5% sethoxydim, 48% basagran, 10.8% haloxyfop+48% basagran, 12.5% sethoxydim+48% bentazone and 50% isoproturon had better effect in controlling Poaceae weeds. The herbicide-controlling spectrum of 50% isoproturon was the widest, and the 48% bentazone and 12.5% sethoxydim+48% bentazone treatment had the highest efficiency in weeds prevention, but both of them made serious damage on A. pcdunculata seedlings. The prevention efficiencies of 10.8% haloxyfop and 12.5% sethoxydim were 68% and 56% under high concentration treatment, and the A. pcdunculata did not represent injury symptoms, so they are suitable for weed prevention in the nursery of A. pcdunculata.
-
Key words:
- Amygdalus pcdunculata
- / herbicide
- / weed
-
[1] 郭春会, 罗 梦, 马玉华, 等. 沙地濒危植物长柄扁桃特性研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 33(12):125-129 [2] SATHE S K. Solubilization, electrophoretie characterization and in vitro digestibility of almond (Prunus amygdalus) proteins[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 1993, 16:249-264 [3] SZE-TAO K W C, Sathe S K. Functional properties and in vitro digestibility of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) protein isolate[J]. Food Chemistry, 2000, 69:153-160 [4] 苏贵兴, 姚玉卿. 我国的野生扁桃资源[J]. 野生植物研究, 1993(2):7-11 [5] 刘孟军. 中国野生果树[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 1998:1-8 [6] 李登武, 党坤良, 温仲明. 黄土高原地区种子植物区系中的珍稀濒危植物研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(13):2321-2328 [7] 邓华平. 景观植物化学除草技术[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2007 [8] 黄彩萍, 曾丽梅. 外来入侵杂草对广州市白云山的危害及其防治策略的探讨[J]. 热带林业, 2003, 31(4): 23–29 [9] 吴长兴, 孙 枫, 王 强, 等. 几种除草剂的生物测定及复配效应研究[J].浙江农业学报, 2000, 12(6):374-377 [10] 陈海伟, 张鲁华, 陈德富. 除草剂及抗除草剂作物的应用现状与展望[J]. 生物技术通报, 2012(10):35-40 [11] 刘玉琛, 叶 非. 除草剂安全剂作用机制研究进展[J]. 植物保护, 2007, 33(6):5-10 [12] Baldwin A, Roers H J, Harwood J L, et al. The inhibition of fatty acid elongation by pebulate can be effectively counteracted by the safener dichlormid[J]. Biochemical Socie ty Transactions, 2000, 28(6):650-651 [13] Baldwin A, Roersh J, Harwood J L, et al. Fatty acid elongation is important in the activity of thiocarbamate herbi-cides and in safening by dichlormid[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2003, 54(385):1289-1294 [14] Wu J R, Hwang I T, Hatzos K K. Effects of chloroacetanilide herbicides on membrane fatty acid desaturationand lipid composition in rice, maize, and sorghum[J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2000, 66(3):161-169 [15] Webster E P, Masson J A. Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice[J]. Weed Sci, 2001, 49(5):652-657 [16] Duke S O, Powles S B. Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds:now and in the future[J]. AgBioForum, 2009, 12(3-4):346-357
计量
- 文章访问数: 3197
- HTML全文浏览量: 156
- PDF下载量: 1172
- 被引次数: 0