甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及其影响因子
Litter Accumulation and Its Impact Factor of Three Main Forest Communities in Xinglong Mountain, Gansu Province
-
摘要: [目的]为了阐明森林凋落物累积量与主要影响因子的关系。[方法]2013-2014年,采用时空互代法和标准样地调查法,研究了兴隆山山杨-白桦-青杄林演替过程中山杨-白桦-青杄中龄林、青杄中龄林和青杄近熟林3种森林群落凋落物累积量及其主要影响因子。[结果]表明:1)随森林正向演替的进行,森林凋落物层厚度和总累积量先减小后增加,3种森林群落凋落物层厚度均值依次为5.26、5.03和5.59 cm,总累积量均值依次为57.08、51.44、56.34 t·hm-2; 2)随海拔高度的升高,青杄近熟林凋落物总累积量不断增加,海拔2300、2400和2500 m均值依次为48.56、55.93和64.55 t·hm-2;林分密度大的、坡度小的青杄中龄林凋落物总累积量较大,林分密度为2133、1705和1065株·hm-2的均值依次为49.87、48.59和45.36 t·hm-2,坡度为22°、32°和41°的均值依次为58.35、49.90和48.59 t·hm-2; 3)凋落物未分解层与林分胸径、树高、针叶树密度呈显著相关性。[结论]森林凋落物累积量影响因子较多,其大小是众多因子共同作用的结果。在林分和立地因子中,海拔影响较为明显,随海拔高度的升高而不断增加;林分密度、坡度等因子均有影响,但作用不明显;林分胸径、树高、针叶树密度与未分解层累积量呈显著负相关性,而与已分解层呈显著正相关性。Abstract: In order to illustrate the relationship between forest litter cumulants and its key impact factors, the litter accumulation amount and its main environmental factors of three forest communities(middle-aged Populus davidiana-Betula platyphylla-Picea wilosonii forest, middle-aged Picea wilsonii forest and pre-matured P. wilsonii forest)during the succession of Populus davidiana-B. platyphylla-Picea wilosonii forest were studied by using the methods of spatial series representing temporal series and standard sample survey method in 2013-2014 in Xinglong Mountain of Gansu Province. The results showed as follows:1. The thickness and total accumulation amount of litters decreased at first and then increased with the positive succession of forest communities. The average values of thickness for the three forest communities were 5.26 cm, 5.03 cm and 5.59 cm respectively,and the average values of total accumulation amount were 57.08 t·hm-2, 51.44 t·hm-2, and 56.34 t·hm-2. 2. For the pre-matured P. wilsonii forest, the total accumulation amount of litter was gradually increasing with the increase of elevation, and the average values of the three elevations of 2300 m, 2400 m, 2500 m were 48.56 t·hm-2,55.93 t·hm-2, and 64.55 t·hm-2 respectively;For the middle-aged P. wilsonii forest, the total accumulation amount of litter of high density stand and small slope were greater, but the impact of the density and slope on the acumulation amount of litter was not obvious, the average values for the stand densities of 2133 plants·hm-2, 1705 plants·hm-2 and 1065 plants·hm-2 were 49.87 t·hm-2, 48.59 t·hm-2 and 45.36 t·hm-2 respectively,while the average values for the slopes of 22°, 32° and 41° were 58.35 t·hm-2, 49.9 t·hm-2 and 48.59 t·hm-2. 3. The correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation among the accumulation amount of litter un-decomposed and DBH, height, conifer density. The enviromental factors affacting the accumulation amount of forest litter were various, and the litter amount was the result of combined action of many factors.
-
Key words:
- litter accumulation amount
- / forest succession
- / elevations
- / stand density
- / slope
-
[1] 骆宗诗,向成华,慕长龙.绵阳官司河流域主要森林类型凋落物含量及动态变化[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):1772-1781. [2] 马玉珠,程栋梁,钟全林,等.中国森林凋落物不同组分异速比例关系[J].植物生态学报,2013,37(12):1071-1079. [3] 彭少麟,刘强.森林凋落物动态及其对全球变暖的响应[J].生态学报, 2002, 22(9):1532-1544. [4] 何帆,王得祥雷瑞德,等.秦岭林区主要树种叶片凋落物性质的研究[J].西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(4):30-33. [5] 郑路,卢立华.我国森林地表凋落物现存量及养分特征[J].西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(1):63-69. [6] 张庆费,徐绒娣.浙江天童常绿阔叶林演替过程的凋落物现存量[J].生态学杂志1999,18(2):17-21. [7] 刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸,等.鼎湖山3种不同演替阶段森林凋落物的持水特性[J].林业科学,2013,49(9):8-15. [8] 薛立,何跃君,屈明,等.华南典型人工林凋落物的持水特性[J].植物生态学报2005,29(3):415-421. [9] 黄宗胜,符裕红,喻理飞.喀斯特森林植被自然恢复中凋落物现存量及其碳库特征演化[J].林业科学研究,2013,26(1):008-014. [10] 周新年,巫志龙,郑丽凤,等.天然林择伐10年后凋落物现存量及其养分含量[J].林业科学, 2008, 44(10):25-28. [11] 魏强,凌雷,张广忠,等.甘肃兴隆山主要森林类型凋落物累积量及持水特性[J].应用生态学报, 2011, 22(10):2589-2598. [12] Pedersen L B, Hansen J B. A comparison of litter fall and element fluxes in even aged Norway spruce, sitka spruce and beech stands in Denmark[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1999, 114(8):55-70. [13] 吴毅,刘文耀,沈有信,等.滇石林地质公园喀斯特山地天然林和人工林凋落物与死地被物的动态特征[J].山地学报,2007,25(3):317-325. [14] 路翔,项文化,任辉,等.中亚热带四种森林凋落物及碳氮贮量比较[J].生态学杂志, 2012, 31(9):2234-2240. [15] 高人,周广柱.辽宁东部山区几种主要森林植被类型凋落物层持水性能研究[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2002, 33(2):115-118. [16] Joanna F D, Mary C S, Straker C J. Litter production and accumulation in Pinus patula plantations of the Mpumalanga Province, South Africa[J]. Plant and Soil,1998,203(2):183-190. [17] 齐泽民,王开运,宋光煜,等.川西亚高山箭竹群落枯枝落叶层生物化学特性[J].生态学报,2004,24(6):1230-1236. [18] 吴波,石培礼井学辉,等.大兴安岭东部林区植被蓄水潜力与价值的评估[J].林业科学研究, 2006, 19(6):706-712. [19] 聂雪花,车克钧,刘贤德,等.祁连山西水林区主要森林类型土壤水文功能研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2009, 37(15):7269-7272. [20] 时忠杰,王彦辉,徐丽宏,等.六盘山主要森林类型枯落物的水文功能[J].北京林业大学学报, 2009,31(1):91-99. [21] 张家武,廖利平,李锦芳,等.马尾松火力楠混交林凋落动态及其对土壤养分的影响[J].应用生态学报,1994,18(4):306-313. [22] Pausas J G. Litter fall and litter decomposition in Pinus sylvestris forests of the Eastern Pyrenees[J]. Journal Vegetation Science,1997, 8:643-650. [23] 原作强,李步杭,白雪娇,等.长白山阔叶红松林凋落物组成及其季节动态[J].应用生态学报,2010, 21(9):2171-2178. -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 2919
- HTML全文浏览量: 294
- PDF下载量: 969
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
