采伐对森林土壤碳库影响的不确定性

雷蕾; 肖文发

采伐对森林土壤碳库影响的不确定性

雷蕾^1,2,
肖文发^1,2,

1.
中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所国家林业局森林生态环境重点实验室, 北京 100091
2.
南京林业大学南方现代林业协同创新中心, 江苏南京 210037
基金项目:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项基金"典型森林土壤有机碳分布格局和微生物地理学研究。项目编号:CAFRIFEEP201101
中图分类号: S714

Uncertainty Effect of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon Pool:A Review

LEI Lei^1,2,
XIAO Wen-fa^1,2,

1.
Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, State Forestry Administration Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment, Beijing 10009, China
2.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Ferestry in Southern China Nanjing Forestry University, Nangjing 210037, China
CLC number: S714

摘要: 森林土壤有机碳(SOC)是全球碳循环的重要组成部分,然而,多样的森林类型和不同森林经营措施的干扰,使得森林土壤碳库维持机制以及碳固存过程的研究和森林土壤碳库的估算存在较大的变异。作为主要的森林经营措施之一,采伐对森林土壤碳储量以及碳过程均产生直接或间接地影响。为深刻理解森林土壤碳库对于采伐干扰的响应,本文综述了近十几年来不同采伐方式下森林土壤碳储量及其主要碳排放过程——土壤呼吸的研究现状,综合分析了采伐方式、森林类型、采伐剩余物管理以及微生物因子等对土壤碳库的影响及其不确定性,并在此基础上阐述了研究中尚未解决的主要问题:1)生物因子作为CO2产生的主体,在应对干扰时结构、功能的变化直接影响着土壤碳排放以及碳固定,但它们具体作用机制以及过程并不清楚,需展开进一步的调查;2)不同森林采伐方式对不同地区和不同类型森林土壤的影响的复杂性,亟须在进一步加强实验研究的基础上,发展森林土壤碳循环的过程或机理模型,为森林生态系统完整的碳循环过程表达及碳计量提供技术支撑,以期为我国森林经营以及碳汇等方面研究提供参考。
- 采伐方式
- / 土壤有机碳
- / 采伐剩余物
- / 土壤呼吸
- / 不确定性
Abstract: Forest soil carbon(SOC) is the key part of the global carbon cycle. However, the existence of multiple forest types with various forest managements makes huge variabilities on maintenance mechanism of forest soil carbon pool and soil sequestration process, so as the evaluation of forest soil pool. Being the main method of forest management, harvest has effect on forest carbon pool and carbon process directly and indirectly. Therefore it is critical to have deeper understanding of response of the forest SOC to forest harvest. By literature review, this paper summarized research progress on forest soil carbon pool and soil respiration with different harvest types at home and abroad, and the uncertainties that influenced results had been analyzed. Harvest types, forest types, harvest residue management and microbial factors were main factors regulated SOC. Based on the review, unsolved problems of the recent research, emphasis of related work in the future had also been proposed:1)biotic factors was the main producer of CO2, and its sturcture and function changed responsed to disturbance, which influenced the soil carbon realese and sequestration straightly, however the machanism of this process was unclear, needed to be investugated further; 2) the effects of various harvest types to different area and forest soil types was so complex that process models and machnism models needed to be developed based on the intensive experiment researches, to provide technical support for carbon cycle and carbon accounting of forest ecosystem, and reference for the studies about forest management and carbon sink in China.
- harvest type
- / soil organic carbon
- / harvest residue
- / soil respiration, uncertainty

[1]	Bonan G B. Forests and Climate Change:Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5882):1444-1449.
[2]	Pan Y, Birdsey R A, Fang J, et al. A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World's Forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):988-993.
[3]	Jandl R, Lindner M, Vesterdal L, et al. How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration[J]. Geoderma, 2007, 137:253-268.
[4]	Powers M, Kolka R, Palik B, et al. Long-term management impacts on carbon storage in Lake States forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2011, 262(3):424-431.
[5]	Olsson B A, Staaf H K, Lundkvist H, et al. Carbon and nitrogen in coniferous forest soils after clear-felling and harvests of different intensity[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 1996, 82(1):19-32.
[6]	Jurgensen M, Tarpey R, Jim P, et al. Long-term Effect of Silvicultural Thinnings on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Pools[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2012, 4(76):1418-1425.
[7]	Christophel D, Spengler S, Schmidt B, et al. Customary selective harvesting has considerably decreased organic carbon and nitrogen stocks in forest soils of the Bavarian Limestone Alps[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 305:167-176.
[8]	Johnson DW, Curtis PS. Effects of forest management on temperate forest soil C and N storage:meta-analysis[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, 140(2-3):227-238.
[9]	Johnson D W, Knoepp J D, Swank W T, et al. Effects of forest management on soil carbon:results of some long-term resampling studies[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2002, 116:S201-S208.
[10]	Saiz G, Green C, Butterbach-Bahl K, et al. Seasonal and spatial variability of soil respiration in four Sitka spruce stands[J]. Plant and Soil. 2006, 287(1-2):161-176.
[11]	Ngao J, Epron D, Delpierre N, et al. Spatial variability of soil CO₂ efflux linked to soil parameters and ecosystem characteristics in a temperate beech forest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2012, 154-155:136-146.
[12]	刘世荣,王晖,栾军伟.中国森林土壤碳储量与土壤碳过程研究进展[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(19):5437-5448.
[13]	Laporte M. Effect of clearcutting, selection cutting, shelterwood cutting and microsites on soil surface CO2 efflux in a tolerant hardwood ecosystem of northern Ontario[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003, 174(1-3):565-575.
[14]	Misson L, Tang J W, Xu M, et al. Influences of recovery from clear-cut, climate variability, and thinning on the carbon balance of a young ponderosa pine plantation[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 130(3-4):207-222.
[15]	Tang J, Qi Y, Xu M, et al. Forest thinning and soil respiration in a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada. Tree Physiology, 2005, 25(1):57-66.
[16]	Sullivan B W, Kolb T E, Hart S C, et al. Thinning reduces soil carbon dioxide but not methane flux from southwestern USA ponderosa pine forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 255(12):4047-4055.
[17]	Olajuyigbe S, Tobin B, Saunders M, et al. Forest thinning and soil respiration in a Sitka spruce forest in Ireland[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2012, 157:86-95.
[18]	Zha T S, Barr A G, Black A T, et al. Carbon sequestration in boreal jack pine stands following harvesting[J]. Global Change Biology. 2009, 15(6):1475-1487.
[19]	Kowalski A S, Loustau D, Berbigier P, et al. Paired comparisons of carbon exchange between undisturbed and regenerating stands in four managed forests in Europe[J]. Global Change Biology, 2004, 10(10):1707-1723.
[20]	Amiro B D, Barr A G, Black T A, et al. Carbon, energy and water fluxes at mature and disturbed forest sites, Saskatchewan, Canada[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006, 136(3-4):237-251.
[21]	孟春,王立海,沈微.小兴安岭针阔混交林择伐6a后林地土壤呼吸速率空间变异性[J].东北林业大学学报, 2011, 239(3):72-75.
[22]	汪金松,范娟,赵秀海,等.太岳山油松人工林土壤呼吸组分及其影响因子[J].林业科学, 2013, 02:1-7.
[23]	罗璐,申国珍,谢宗强,等.神农架海拔梯度上4种典型森林的土壤呼吸组分及其对温度的敏感性[J].植物生态学报, 2011, 07:722-730.
[24]	Toland D E, Zak D R. Seasonal patterns of soil respiration in intact and clear-cut northern hardwood forests[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1994, 24(8):1711-1716.
[25]	Soe A R, Buchmann N. Spatial and temporal variations in soil respiration in relation to stand structure and soil parameters in an unmanaged beech forest[J]. Tree Physiology, 2005, 25(11):1427-1436.
[26]	Högberg P, Nordgren A, Buchmann N, et al. Large-scale forest girdling shows that current photosynthesis drives soil respiration[J]. Nature, 2001, 411:789-792.
[27]	Marron N, Plain C, Longdoz B, et al. Seasonal and daily time course of the 13C composition in soil CO2 efflux recorded with a tunable diode laser spectrophotometer(TDLS)[J]. Plant Soil, 2009, 318(1-2):137-151.
[28]	杨玉盛,陈光水,王小国,等.皆伐对杉木人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J].土壤学报, 2005, 42(4):584-590.
[29]	郭辉,董希斌,姜帆.采伐强度对小兴安岭低质林分土壤碳通量的影响[J].林业科学, 2010, 46(2):110-115.
[30]	Zheng Z, Yu G, Fu Y, et al. Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration is affected by prevailing climatic conditions and soil organic carbon content:A trans-China based case study[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41(7):1531-1540.
[31]	Almagro M, López J, Querejeta J I, et al. Temperature dependence of soil CO₂ efflux is strongly modulated by seasonal patterns of moisture availability in a Mediterranean ecosystem[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41(3):594-605.
[32]	Gershenson A, Bader N E, Cheng W. Effects of substrate availability on the temperature sensitivity of soil organic matter decomposition[J]. Global Change Biology, 2009, 15(1):176-183.
[33]	Epron D, Ngao J R, Granier A. Interannual variation of soil respiration in a beech forest ecosystem over a six-year study[J]. Annual Forest Science, 2004, 61(6):499-505.
[34]	杨庆朋,徐明,刘洪升,等.土壤呼吸温度敏感性的影响因素和不确定性[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(8):2301-2311
[35]	Boone R D, Nadelhoffer K J, Canary J D., et al. Roots exert a strong influence on the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration[J]. Nature, 1998,(396):570-572.
[36]	Wen X, Yu G, Sun X, Li Q, et al. Soil moisture effect on the temperature dependence of ecosystem respiration in a subtropical Pinus plantation of southeastern China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006, 137:166-175.
[37]	郭辉,董希斌,姜帆.皆伐方式对小兴安岭低质林土壤呼吸的影响[J].林业科学, 2009, 45(10):32-38.
[38]	袁渭阳,李贤伟,张健,等.不同年龄巨桉林土壤呼吸及其与土壤温度和细根生物量的关系[J].林业科学. 2009, 45(11):1-8.
[39]	Guo J, Yang Y, Chen G, et al. Effects of clear-cutting and slash burning on soil respiration in Chinese fir and evergreen broadleaved forests in mid-subtropical China[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 333(1-2):249-261.
[40]	Nilsen P, Strand L T. Thinning intensity effects on carbon and nitrogen stores and fluxes in a Norway spruce(Picea abies(L.) Karst.) Stand after 33 years[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2008, 256(3):201-208.
[41]	Yang A, Son Y, Noh N J, et al. Effect of thinning on carbon storage in soil, forest floor and coarse woody debris of Pinus densiflora stands with different stand ages in Gangwon-do, central Korea[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2011, 7(1):30-37.
[42]	Grand S, Lavkulich L M. Effects of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon and Related Variables in Canadian Spodosols[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2012, 76(5):1816-1827.
[43]	Tamminen P, Saarsalmi A, Smolander A, et al. Effects of logging residue harvest in thinnings on amounts of soil carbon and nutrients in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012, 263:31-38
[44]	方晰,田大伦,项文化.不同经营方式对杉木林采伐迹地土壤C储量的影响[J].中南林学院学报, 2004, 24(1):1-5.
[45]	薛立,向文静,何跃君,等.不同林地清理方式对杉木林土壤肥力的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2005,(08):1417-1421.
[46]	巫志龙,周新年,郑丽凤,等.天然林择伐10a后林地土壤理化性质研究[J].山地学报, 2008,(02):180-184.
[47]	郑丽凤,周新年,巫志龙,等.天然林不同强度采伐10 a后林地土壤理化性质分析[J].林业科学研究, 2008, 21(1):106-109.
[48]	骆土寿,陈步峰,陈永富,等.海南岛霸王岭热带山地雨林采伐经营初期土壤碳氮储量[J].林业科学研究, 2000, 13(2):123-128.
[49]	马祥庆,俞新妥,何智英,等.马尾松采伐剩余物分解过程中土壤肥力的变化研究[J].生态学杂志, 1994,(05):18-22.
[50]	Binkley DAN, Giardina C. Why Do Tree Species Affect Soils? The Warp and Woof of Tree-Soil Interactions. Biogeochemistry[J]. 1998, 42(1/2):89- 106.
[51]	Nave L E, Vance E D, Swanston C W, et al. Harvest impacts on soil carbon storage in temperate forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(5):857-866.
[52]	Chen HYH, Shrestha B M. Stand age, fire and clearcutting affect soil organic carbon and aggregation of mineral soils in boreal forests[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2012,50:140-157.
[53]	Campbell J, Alberti G, Martin J, et al. Carbon dynamics of a ponderosa pine plantation following a thinning treatment in the northern Sierra Nevada[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 257(2):453-463.
[54]	Campbell J L, Sun O J, Law B E. Disturbance and net ecosystem production across three climatically distinct forest landscapes[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 2004, 18(4):1-11.
[55]	Law B E, Thornton P E, Irvine J, et al. Carbon storage and fluxes in ponderosa pine forests at different developmental stages[J]. Global Change Biology, 2001, 7:755-777.
[56]	鲁洋,黄从德,董刚明,等.柳杉人工林皆伐后初期土壤有机碳和微生物量碳动态[J].四川林业科技, 2010, 31(5):35-40.
[57]	Williams C A, Vanderhoof M K, Khomik M, et al. Post-clearcut dynamics of carbon, water and energy exchanges in a midlatitude temperate, deciduous broadleaf forest environment[J]. Global Change Biology, 2013, 20(3):992-1007.
[58]	Vesterdal L, Dalsgaard M, Felby C, et al. Effects of thinning and soil properties on accumulation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in the forest floor of Norway spruce stands[J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 1995,77(1):1-10.
[59]	Hoover C M. Management Impacts on Forest Floor and Soil Organic Carbon in Northern Temperate Forests of the US[J]. Carbon Balance Management, 2011, 6(1):17.
[60]	胡小飞,陈伏生,葛刚.森林采伐对林地表层土壤主要特征及其生态过程的影响[J].土壤通报, 2007, 38(6):1213-1218.
[61]	Park J H, Kalbitz K, Matzner E. Resource control on the production of dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen in a deciduous forest floor[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34:813-822.
[62]	Hu Z, He Z, Huang Z, et al. Effects of harvest residue management on soil carbon and nitrogen processes in a Chinese fir plantation[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 326:163-170.
[63]	Busse M D, Sanchez F G, Ratcliff A W, et al. Soil carbon sequestration and changes in fungal and bacterial biomass following incorporation of forest residues[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2009, 41(2):220-227.
[64]	胡振宏,何宗明,范少辉,等.采伐剩余物管理措施对二代杉木人工林土壤全碳、全氮含量的长期效应[J].生态学报, 2013,(13):4205-4213.
[65]	Heijden MGA, Bardgett R D, Straalen N M. The unseen majority:Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2008,11(3):296-310.
[66]	Prescott C E, Grayston S J. Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil:Current knowledge and research needs[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013, 309:19-27.
[67]	Waldrop M P, Balser T C, Firestone M K. Linking microbial community composition to function in a tropical soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000, 32(13):1837-1846.
[68]	Marshall V. Impacts of forest harvesting on biological processes in northern forest soils[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 133(1-2):43-60.
[69]	Sun Y, Wu J, Shao Y, et al. Responses of soil microbial communities to prescribed burning in two paired vegetation sites in southern China[J]. Ecological Research, 2011, 26(3):669-677.
[70]	Stevenson B A, Hunter D W F, Rhodes P L. Temporal and seasonal change in microbial community structure of an undisturbed, disturbed, and carbon-amended pasture soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 75:175-185.
[71]	Keiblinger K M, Hall E K, Wanek W, et al. The effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on microbial carbon-use-efficiency[J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2010:no-no.
[72]	Fontaine S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, et al. Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content[J]. Ecology Letters, 2004, 7(4):314-320.
[73]	Brant J B, Sulzman E W, Myrold D D. Microbial community utilization of added carbon substrates in response to long-term carbon input manipulation[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006, 38(8):2219-2232.
[74]	Bird J A, Herman D J, Firestone M K. Rhizosphere priming of soil organic matter by bacterial groups in a grassland soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43(4):718-725.
[75]	Moore-Kucera J, Dick R P. PLFA Profiling of Microbial Community Structure and Seasonal Shifts in Soils of a Douglas-fir Chronosequence[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2008, 55(3):500-511.
[76]	Cairney J W, Meharg A A. Interactions between ectomycorrhizal fungi and soil saprotrophs:implications for decomposition of organic matter in soils and degradation of organic pollutants in the rhizosphere[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany, 2002, 80(8):803-809.
[77]	Hartmann M, Howes C G, Vaninsberghe D, et al. Significant and persistent impact of timber harvesting on soil microbial communities in Northern coniferous forests[J]. The ISME Journal, 2012, 6(12):2199-2218.
[78]	Vucetich J A, Waite T A, Qvarnemark L, et al. Review:Population Variability and Extinction Risk[J]. Conservation Biology, 2000, 14(6):1704-1714.
[79]	Baath E, Frostegard A, Pennanen T, et al. Microbial community structure and pH response in relation to soil organic matter quality in wood-ash fertilized, clear-cut or burned coniferous forest soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1995, 27(2):229- 240.
[80]	Busse M D, Beattie S E, Powers R F, et al. Microbial community responses in forest mineral soil to compaction, organic matter removal, and vegetation control[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 36(3):577-588.
[81]	Mummey D L, Clarke J T, Cole C A, et al. Spatial analysis reveals differences in soil microbial community interactions between adjacent coniferous forest and clearcut ecosystems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(7):1138-1147.
[82]	Chatterjee A, Vance G F, Pendall E, et al. Timber harvesting alters soil carbon mineralization and microbial community structure in coniferous forests[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(7):1901-1907.
[83]	Schindlbacher A, Rodler A, Kuffner M, et al. Experimental warming effects on the microbial community of a temperate mountain forest soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43(7):1417-1425.
[84]	Ballard T M. Impacts of forest management on northern forest soils[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2000, 133(1):37-42.
[85]	Powers R F, Andrew Scott D, Sanchez F G, et al. The North American long-term soil productivity experiment:Findings from the first decade of research[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2005, 220(1-3):31-50.
[86]	Alster C J, German D P, Lu Y,et al. Microbial enzymatic responses to drought and to nitrogen addition in a southern California grassland[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 64:68-79.
[87]	[Mccarthy A J, Williams S T. Actinomycetes as agents of biodegradation in the environment - a review[J]. Gene, 1992(115):189-192.
[88]	Kramer C, Gleixner G. Soil organic matter in soil depth profiles:Distinct carbon preferences of microbial groups during carbon transformation[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2008, 40(2):425-433.
[89]	Steinweg J M, Dukes J S, Paul E A, et al. Microbial responses to multi-factor climate change:effects on soil enzymes[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2013, 4.
[90]	Burns R G, Deforest J L, Marxsen J, et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment:Current knowledge and future directions[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 58:216-234.
[91]	Burns R G. Enzyme activity in soil:location and a possible role in microbial ecology[J]. Soil biology and biochemistry, 1982, 42:423-427.
[92]	Hassett J E, Zak D R. Aspen Harvest Intensity Decreases Microbial Biomass, Extracellular Enzyme Activity, and Soil Nitrogen Cycling[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2005, 69(1):227.
[93]	Sinsabaugh R L, Follstad Shah J J. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of recalcitrant organic matter decomposition:the growth rate hypothesis in reverse[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2011, 102(1-3):31-43.
[94]	Sinsabaugh R L. Phenol oxidase, peroxidase and organic matter dynamics of soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010, 42(3):391-404.
[95]	You Y, Wang J, Huang X, et al. Relating microbial community structure to functioning in forest soil organic carbon transformation and turnover[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 4(5):633-647.
[96]	Sinsabaugh R L, Hill B H, Follstad Shah J J. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment[J]. Nature, 2009, 462(7274):795-798.

[1]	唐晓鹿 , 范少辉 , 漆良华 , 刘广路 , 官凤英 , 杜满义 , 许庆标 . 采伐对幕布山区毛竹林土壤呼吸的影响. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(1): 52-57.
[2]	唐国勇 , 李昆 , 孙永玉 , 张春华 . 土地利用方式对土壤有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(6): 754-759.
[3]	陈立新 , 李刚 , 刘云超 , 段文标 , 孙双红 , 李帆帆 , 李少博 , 毛弘宇 . 外源有机物与温度耦合作用对红松阔叶混交林土壤有机碳的激发效应. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(5): 797-804. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.05.013
[4]	曹军 , 张加龙 , 肖庆琳 , 王飞平 , 韩雪莲 , 黄屹杰 . 基于随机森林和蒙特卡洛的高山松地上碳储量估测及不确定性分析. 林业科学研究, 2023, 36(5): 131-139. doi: 10.12403/j.1001-1498.20220603
[5]	徐海东 , 苑海静 , 熊静 , 虞木奎 , 成向荣 . 杉阔异龄复层林对土壤团聚体稳定性和有机碳及养分储量的影响. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(3): 107-115. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.03.014
[6]	黄世能 , 郑海水 , 翁启杰 . 林龄、采伐方式对大叶相思萌芽更新的影响*. 林业科学研究, 1994, 7(5): 537-541.
[7]	薛丽佳 , 高人 , 杨玉盛 , 尹云锋 , 马红亮 , 刘燕萍 . 武夷山土壤有机碳和黑碳的分配规律研究. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(3): 399-403.
[8]	马少杰 , 李正才 , 周本智 , 格日乐图 , 孔维健 , 安艳飞 . 北亚热带天然次生林群落演替对土壤有机碳的影响. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(6): 845-849.
[9]	徐耀文 , 姜仲茂 , 武锋 , 杨倩梨 , 廖宝文 . 翠亨湿地无瓣海桑人工林土壤有机碳分布特征及与土壤理化指标相关性. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(1): 62-68. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.01.008
[10]	李正才 , 徐德应 , 傅懋毅 , 孙雪忠 , 奚金荣 . 北亚热带土地利用变化对土壤有机碳垂直分布特征及储量的影响. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(6): 744-749.
[11]	王健健 , 赵学春 , 来利明 , 朱林海 , 王永吉 , 周继华 , 姜联合 , 马远见 , 赵春强 , 郑元润 . 新疆三工河流域柽柳群落细根生产与周转对土壤有机碳的贡献. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(6): 809-814.
[12]	刘春华 , 吴东梅 , 刘雨晖 , 陈辉 , 沈宝贵 , 蒋宗垲 , 刘小飞 . 氮沉降对米槠天然林土壤有机碳及微生物群落结构的影响. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(2): 42-49. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.02.005
[13]	邓东周 , 范志平 , 王红 , 孙学凯 , 高俊刚 , 曾德慧 , 张新厚 . 土壤水分对土壤呼吸的影响. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(5): 722-727.
[14]	刘江伟 , 徐海东 , 林同岳 , 曹国华 , 成向荣 . 海涂围垦区不同林分土壤活性有机碳垂直变化特征. 林业科学研究, 2022, 35(3): 18-26. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2022.03.003
[15]	赖家明 , 李开志 , 黄从德 , 张健 , 杨万勤 . 不同改造措施对马尾松低效林土壤活性有机碳的影响. 林业科学研究, 2013, 26(2): 167-173.
[16]	齐梦娟 , 石朔蓉 , 姜春前 , 王书韧 , 王辉 , 王景弟 . 青冈栎次生林土壤活性有机碳对间伐强度的响应. 林业科学研究, 2021, 34(6): 122-129. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.06.015
[17]	王鹤松 , 张劲松 , 孟平 , 高峻 , 贾长荣 . 华北山区非主要生长季典型人工林土壤呼吸变化特征. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(6): 820-825.
[18]	刘博奇 , 牟长城 , 邢亚娟 , 王庆贵 . 模拟氮沉降对云冷杉红松林土壤呼吸的影响. 林业科学研究, 2012, 25(6): 767-772.
[19]	戴捷 , 贾志清 , 李清雪 , 何凌仙子 , 杨凯悦 , 高娅 . 自然降雨对高寒沙地中间锦鸡儿人工林土壤呼吸的影响. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(4): 151-159. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.04.019
[20]	黄雪蔓 , 刘世荣 , 尤业明 . 第二代桉树人工纯林和混交林土壤呼吸及其组分研究. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(5): 575-582.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 2892
HTML全文浏览量: 192
PDF下载量: 1063
被引次数: 0

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

留言板

采伐对森林土壤碳库影响的不确定性

Uncertainty Effect of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon Pool:A Review

计量

采伐对森林土壤碳库影响的不确定性

English Abstract

Uncertainty Effect of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon Pool:A Review

全文HTML

目录

留言板

采伐对森林土壤碳库影响的不确定性

Uncertainty Effect of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon Pool:A Review

计量

出版历程

采伐对森林土壤碳库影响的不确定性

English Abstract

Uncertainty Effect of Forest Harvest on Soil Carbon Pool:A Review

全文HTML

目录