• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

A Study on Soil Properties in Forest Gaps and under Canopy in Broadleaved Pinus koriensis Forest in Changbai Mountain

  • Received Date: 2005-05-10
  • The species components,species diversities and soil properties in gap and under canopy in broad-leaved Pinus koriensis forests in Changbai Mountains were studied.The results of the study indicated that the species components and species diversities in gap were different from those under canopy.The Shannon-Wiener index,evenness index and abundance index in gap were higher than those under canopy in seedling layer,while the community dominance in seedling layer increaseed in closed canopy.The physico-chemical properties of soil and litter changed with space and resources usefulness in gaps.The thickness,stock and water holding capacity of litter layer under canopy were significantly(P<0.01) higher than those in gap.The content of total nitrogen and total potassium of litter in gap were 10.47% and 20.73% higher than those under canopy,but the content of total phosphorus and organic carbon under canopy were 15.23% and 12.66% more than those in gap.The water content of 0~10 cm and 10~20 cm of soil layer in gap were 17.65% and 16.17% more than those under canopy,the soil bulk density of 0~10 cm was slightly higher under canopy than that in gap,but there was no apparent difference in the soil bulk density of 10~20 cm.The soil pH were 5.80 and 5.85 in gap and under canopy respectively,and it wasn't significantly different.The content of soil organic matter,total nitrogen and total potassium in gap were 12.85%,7.67% and 2.38% higher than those under canopy.The content of NH_3-N,available phosphorus,available potassium and total phosphorus in soil under canopy were 13.33%,20.04%,16.52% and 4.30% higher than those in gap.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    W attA S . Pattern and process in th e plan t comm un it ies[J] . E cology, 1947, 35: 1~ 22
    [2] 张一平, 刘玉洪, 马友鑫, 等. 西双版纳干季晴天次生林林窗气温时空分布特征[J] . 生态学报, 2001, 21(2) : 211~ 215

    [3] 张一平, 王进欣, 刘玉洪, 等. 热带次生林林窗平均气温空间分布特征的初步分析[J] . 生态学杂志, 2001, 20 (2) : 1 ~ 4

    [4] 张一平, 窦军霞, 刘玉洪, 等. 热带季节雨林林窗小气候要素时空分布特征[J] . 福建林学院学报, 2002, 22 (1) : 1~ 3

    [5] 沙丽清, 曹敏. 西双版纳热带季节雨林林冠下及林窗中土壤养分对比研究[J] . 东北林业大学学报, 1999, 27 (6) : 78 ~ 80

    [6] 耿玉清, 单宏臣, 谭笑, 等. 人工针叶林冠空隙土壤的研究[J] . 北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24(4) : 16~ 19

    [7]

    Denslow J S, E llisonA M, Salifb rd R R. Treefall gap size effects inAbove-and below-ground p rocesses in a trop ica lw et forest [J] . Jou rnal of E cology, 1998, 86: 597 ~ 609
    [8]

    Arunachalam A, A runach alam K. Inf luence of gap size and soilpropert ies on m icrobial b iom ass in a subtrop ical hum id forest ofnorth-east Ind ia[J] . P lan t and Soi,l 2000, 223: 185~ 193
    [9] 藏润国, 刘静芳, 董大方. 林隙动态与森林多样性[M] . 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1999

    [10] 中国土壤学会. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M] . 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1999

    [11] 藏润国, 徐化成, 高文韬. 红松阔叶林主要树种对林隙大小及其发育阶段更新反应规律的研究[J]. 林业科学, 1999, 35 (3): 2~ 9

    [12] 藏润国, 蒋有绪, 余世孝. 海南霸王岭热带山地雨林森林循环与树种多样性动态[J]. 生态学报, 2002, 22 (1) : 24 ~ 32

    [13] 朱小龙, 李振基. 南靖和溪南亚热带雨林林隙内树种更新初步研究[J] . 厦门大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 41(5): 589~ 595

    [14] 边巴多吉, 郭泉水, 次柏, 等. 西藏冷杉原始林林隙对草本植物和灌木树种多样性的影响[J] . 应用生态学报, 2004, 15 (2) :191 ~ 194

    [15]

    Ostertag R. B low-ground effects of canopy gaps in a tropicalw et forest[J] . E cology, 1998, 79: 1294~ 1304
    [16]

    C anham C D. D if feren t responses to gaps am ong shade-toleran t treespecies[J] . Ecology, l989, 70: 548 ~ 550
    [17] 王战, 徐振邦, 李昕. 长白山北坡主要林型和群落结构特征[J] .森林生态系统研究, 1980(1) : 25~ 42

    [18]

    Sw iftM J , H ea lOW , Anderson JM. Decomposit ion in TerrestrialE cosystem s[M] . B lackw el,l Oxford, 1978
    [19]

    A run achalam A, M aithan iK, Pandey H N, et a.l The im pact of d isturban ce on detrital dynam ics and soilm icrob ial b iom ass of a P inu skesiya forest in north-east Ind ia[J] . For E colM anagem, 1996, 88:273~ 282
    [20]

    Zelles L. Fatty acid pattern s of phospholip id s and l ipopolysaccharides in the characterisation ofm icrob ial comm un ities in so il: a review [J] . B iology and Fert ility So ils , 1999, 29: 111 ~ 129
    [21] 薛立, 陈红跃, 毕鸿雁. 马占相思纯林及柚木纯林土壤养分、微生物和酶活性的研究[J] . 华南农业大学学报(自然科学版) ,2002, 23(2) : 12

    [22] 闫德仁, 刘永军. 落叶松人工林土壤微生物的变化[J] . 林业月报, 1995(7) : 13

    [23]

    C ang D H, Yang Y S, Zou S Q. A study on the m icrof lora and b iochem ical properties of soil m icroorgan ism s and the soil fertil ity ofun ter p lanted forest ofCunn ingham ia lanceola ta and Am omum v illosum [J] . S cietia s ilvae S in icae, 1988, 4 (4) : 458 ~ 465
    [24] 赵林森, 王九龄. 杨槐混交林生长及土壤酶与肥力的相互关系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1995, 17(4) : 1 ~ 7

    [25] 孙翠玲, 郭玉文, 佟超然, 等. 杨树混交林地土壤微生物与酶活性的变异研究[J] . 林业科学, 1997, 33(6) : 488~ 496

    [26] 许景伟, 王卫东, 李成. 不同类型黑松混交林土壤微生物、酶及其与土壤养分关系的研究[J] . 北京林业大学学报, 2000, 22(1) : 51~ 55

    [27] 潘维旺, 李景英, 周启水, 等. 土壤微生物与森林环境因子关系初探[J]. 南昌水专学报, 1998, 17(4): 38~ 41

    [28]

    C ampb ellR, GreavesM P. An atom y and comm un ity stru cture of therh izosphere[A] . In: Lynch JM . The rh izosphere[M] . Ch ichester:W iley Press, 1990, 11~ 34
    [29]

    E iland F, Gahon iaT S. B iologically associated C andN in relation tonum ber of bacteria andATP con tent in the rh izosph ere, T rans[M] .15th World C ongr Soil Sc,i 1994, 4: 50~ 51
    [30] 何振立. 土壤微生物量及其在养分循环和环境评价中的意义[J]. 土壤, 1997, 2: 61~ 69

    [31] 田呈明, 刘建军, 梁英梅, 等. 秦岭火地塘林区森林根际微生物及其土壤生化特性研究[J] . 水土保持通报, 1999, 19(2) : 19 ~ 22

    [32] 周国英, 陈小艳, 李倩茹, 等. 油茶林土壤微生物生态分布及土壤酶活性的研究[J] . 经济林研究, 2001, 19(1) : 9~ 12

    [33] 仲庆林, 韩素梅. 油松沙棘混交林土壤酶活性状况的研究[J] .辽宁林业科技, 2001(2) : 18~ 19

    [34] 姚胜蕊, 束怀瑞. 有机物料对苹果根际营养元素动态及土壤酶活性的影响[J] . 土壤学报, 1999, 36(3) : 428~ 432

    [35]

    Pandey C B, S ingh A K, Sharm a D K. Soil prop erties under A cac ian ilotica trees in a trad it ional agroforestry system in cen tral Ind ia[J]. Agroforestry System s, 2000, 49: 53 ~ 61
    [36]

    Lee D, H an X G, Jordan C F. S oil phosphoru s fractions, alum inium, andw ater retent ion as affected bym icrobial act ivity in an u lt isol[J] . P lan t and So i,l 1990, 121: 125 ~ 136
    [37] 刘庆, 吴彦. 滇西北亚高山针叶林林窗大小与更新的初步分析[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2002, 8(5) : 453~ 459

    [38] 罗大庆, 郭泉水, 薛会英. 西藏色季拉山冷杉原始林林隙更新研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(5): 564~ 569

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3955) PDF downloads(1572) Cited by()

Proportional views

A Study on Soil Properties in Forest Gaps and under Canopy in Broadleaved Pinus koriensis Forest in Changbai Mountain

  • 1. Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Forest, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Abstract: The species components,species diversities and soil properties in gap and under canopy in broad-leaved Pinus koriensis forests in Changbai Mountains were studied.The results of the study indicated that the species components and species diversities in gap were different from those under canopy.The Shannon-Wiener index,evenness index and abundance index in gap were higher than those under canopy in seedling layer,while the community dominance in seedling layer increaseed in closed canopy.The physico-chemical properties of soil and litter changed with space and resources usefulness in gaps.The thickness,stock and water holding capacity of litter layer under canopy were significantly(P<0.01) higher than those in gap.The content of total nitrogen and total potassium of litter in gap were 10.47% and 20.73% higher than those under canopy,but the content of total phosphorus and organic carbon under canopy were 15.23% and 12.66% more than those in gap.The water content of 0~10 cm and 10~20 cm of soil layer in gap were 17.65% and 16.17% more than those under canopy,the soil bulk density of 0~10 cm was slightly higher under canopy than that in gap,but there was no apparent difference in the soil bulk density of 10~20 cm.The soil pH were 5.80 and 5.85 in gap and under canopy respectively,and it wasn't significantly different.The content of soil organic matter,total nitrogen and total potassium in gap were 12.85%,7.67% and 2.38% higher than those under canopy.The content of NH_3-N,available phosphorus,available potassium and total phosphorus in soil under canopy were 13.33%,20.04%,16.52% and 4.30% higher than those in gap.

Reference (38)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return