• 中国中文核心期刊
  • 中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)核心库来源期刊
  • 中国科技论文统计源期刊(CJCR)
  • 第二届国家期刊奖提名奖

Citation:

Effects of Prun ing and Growth Regula tors on the Bud Growth andDevelopment of P icea c rassifolia Seedlings

  • Received Date: 2006-06-06
  • Buds on leaders and lateral branches of 5-year-old and 7-year-old Picea crassifolia was seedlings weretreated with different pruning and growth regulator daubing. Removing ap ical bud of Qinghai sp ruce could p romotesome lateral and dormant buds growing and breaking, imp rove branch growth. The effect of different growth regulators and p runingmodels to the buds of P. crassifolia distinct. Among all treatments, treatment effect of removing ap ical bud on trunk and lateral brancheswas superior to that of sp indle-mode p runing and fense-mode p runing, cutting still remaining 3 full buds on stems could significantly decrease the number of buds and then lessen the amount ofbranching, it was the worst one for 7-year-old seedlings. Whittling top buds could increase the quantities of shootand bud on shoot, simultaneously the total length of shoot was also lengthened. 6BA could effectively p romote thegrowth and development of sp ruce buds and branches, CHOUZH IBAO ismost ineffective and even rep ressive amongall treatments, for 5-year-old trees , the influence of p runing and growth regulator on the break-bud number of budson lateral tress was significant, however, for 7-year-old trees, it’s insignificant, and the interaction between themwas remarkable in the treatments to 7-year-old seedlings, but it’s not to 5-year-old seedlings. Daubing 6BA on theremained buds after removing ap ical budswasmore effective to boost the growth and development of buds in P. crassifolia and helpful to p roduce more buds and branches, it’s a kind of the best treatment to P. crassifolia seedlings,cutting or p lastering budswith CZB were unsuitable to the establishment and development of cutting orchard of P.crassifolia.
  • 加载中
  • [1] 马常耕. 世界云杉无性系林业发展现状[J]. 世界林业研究,1993, 6 (6) : 24~31

    [2]

    Bengt B. Large Scale Propagation of Norway Sp ruce ( Picea abies(L. ) Karst. ) by Cuttings [A]. Symposium on Clonal Forestry[C].Upp sala, Sweden, 1981: 33~56
    [3]

    Bentzer B G. Rooting and early shoot characteristics of Picea abiea(L. ) Karst. cutting originating from shoots with enforced verticalgrowth[J]. Scand J For Res, 1988, 3: 481~491
    [4]

    Dormling I, Kellerstram H. Rooting and rejuvenation in p ropagationNorway sp ruce cutting[A]. In: Symposium on Clonal Forestry[C].Swedish University ofAgricultural Sciences,Upp sala ResNotes, 1981(32) : 65~72
    [5] 陈益泰,何贵平,封剑文,等. 杉木采穗圃的树体管理和插条选择[J]. 林业科学研究, 1995, 8 (6) : 611~618

    [6] 杨俊明,沈熙环,赵士杰,等. 华北落叶松采穗圃经营管理技术[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2002, 24 (3) : 28~34

    [7] 来端. 火炬松、湿地松和马尾松采穗圃营建技术[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2001, 21 (2) : 165~168

    [8] 陈永辉,殷云龙,刘勇健,等. 中山杉采穗圃的营建和更新技术研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1997, 24 (2) : 13~17

    [9] 张葳,王思恭,刘永红,等. 云杉苗期和幼林期种间性状变异初探[J]. 陕西林业科技, 1999 (2) : 11~12

    [10]

    Michael A. Cohen Shoot Apex Development and Rooting of Pinusstrobes L. by Dwarf Shoots [J]. Amer Soc Hort Sci, 1978, 103(4) : 483~484
    [11]

    Haines R J, Walker SM, Cop le T R Y. Morphology and rooting ofshoots develop ing in response to decap itation and p runing of Caribbean p ine[J]. New Forests, 1993, 7: 133~141
    [12]

    Kossuth S V. Induction of fascicular bud development in Pinus sylvestris L [J]. Hort Science, 1978, 13 (2) : 174~176
    [13]

    Edson J L. Inducing long-shoot growth for vegetative p ropagation ofwestern larch[J]. New Forests, 1991, 5: 51~60
    [14]

    Clai J B Sr C, Kleinschmit J, Svolba J. Juvenility and serial vegetative p ropagation of Norway sp ruce clones ( Picea abies Karst. )[J]. Silvae Genetica, 1985, 34 (1) : 42~46
    [15] 王笑山,马常耕,寇金堂,等. 日本落叶松整形修剪对插穗产量及生根率的影响[J] . 林业科学, 1995, 31 (2) : 116~124

    [16]

    Donald L. Copes Effects of long-term p runing, meristem origin, andbranch order on the rooting ofDounglas-fir stem cuttings[J] . Can JFor Res, 1992, 22: 1888~1894
    [17]

    Henny R J. BA Induces lateral branching of Peperom ia obtusifolia[J]. Hort Science, 1985, 20 (1) : 115~116
    [18]

    MazzolaM, Costante J F. Efficacy ofBA for the p romotion of lateralbud formation on Douglas-fir and Colorado blue sp ruce [J]. HortScience, 1987, 22 (2) : 234~235
    [19] 黄卫东,韩振海,李文清,等. 6BA复合软膏对幼年苹果树萌芽抽梢和整形的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 1999 (2) : 72~75

    [20]

    Forshey C G. Branching responses of young app le tree to app licationof 6-benzylaminopurine and gibberelin [J]. Amer Soc Hort Sic,1982, 107: 538~541
    [21] 张石成,刘祖祺. 植物化学调控原理与技术[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社, 1999

    [22] 孟昭清,刘国杰,李建华,等. 发枝素对苹果苗生长及圃内整形作用试验[J]. 中国果树, 1996 (2) : 15

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article views(3183) PDF downloads(1571) Cited by()

Proportional views

Effects of Prun ing and Growth Regula tors on the Bud Growth andDevelopment of P icea c rassifolia Seedlings

  • 1. College of Forestry and Horticulture, He’nan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, He’nan, China
  • 2.  Research Institute of Forestry, CAF
  • 3.  Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation, State Forestry Administration,Beijing 100091, China

Abstract: Buds on leaders and lateral branches of 5-year-old and 7-year-old Picea crassifolia was seedlings weretreated with different pruning and growth regulator daubing. Removing ap ical bud of Qinghai sp ruce could p romotesome lateral and dormant buds growing and breaking, imp rove branch growth. The effect of different growth regulators and p runingmodels to the buds of P. crassifolia distinct. Among all treatments, treatment effect of removing ap ical bud on trunk and lateral brancheswas superior to that of sp indle-mode p runing and fense-mode p runing, cutting still remaining 3 full buds on stems could significantly decrease the number of buds and then lessen the amount ofbranching, it was the worst one for 7-year-old seedlings. Whittling top buds could increase the quantities of shootand bud on shoot, simultaneously the total length of shoot was also lengthened. 6BA could effectively p romote thegrowth and development of sp ruce buds and branches, CHOUZH IBAO ismost ineffective and even rep ressive amongall treatments, for 5-year-old trees , the influence of p runing and growth regulator on the break-bud number of budson lateral tress was significant, however, for 7-year-old trees, it’s insignificant, and the interaction between themwas remarkable in the treatments to 7-year-old seedlings, but it’s not to 5-year-old seedlings. Daubing 6BA on theremained buds after removing ap ical budswasmore effective to boost the growth and development of buds in P. crassifolia and helpful to p roduce more buds and branches, it’s a kind of the best treatment to P. crassifolia seedlings,cutting or p lastering budswith CZB were unsuitable to the establishment and development of cutting orchard of P.crassifolia.

Reference (22)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return