Advances in Research on Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ra lston iasolanacea rum in Euca lyptus spp. in China

WU Zhi-hua; XIE Yao-jian; LUO Lian-feng; ZHANG Wei-yao

Volume 20 Issue 4

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2007 > 20(4): 569-575

Citation:

Advances in Research on Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ra lston iasolanacea rum in Euca lyptus spp. in China

1.
China Eucalyp t Research Center, Zhanjiang　524022, Guangdong, China
2.
Yongan Branch of China Eucalyp t Research Center, Yongan　366000, Fujian, China

Received Date: 2005-12-23

Abstract

Bacterialwilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is a p rimary disease to Eucalyptus. The occurrence in Eucalyptus has brought great damages in south p rovinces of China. This paper reviewed the advancement involved inRalstonia solanacearum colony characters, the symp tom and characteristics of the wilt, the mechanism of pathogenesisinduced by the bacteria and resistance exp ressed by the host trees, and the variations in resistance among tree species, clones and virulence among pathogen isolates, and the host-pathogen interactions. The currentwilt controlmeasures and some important aspects of research p roposed for the future were suggested.
- eucalypt, Ralstonia solanacea rum, occurrence and epidemic, control,

References

[R]. Leipzig, Germen, 1996: 1～52
[2]	Buddenhagen IW, Kelman A. Biological and physiological aspects ofbacterial wilt caused by Pseudom onas solanacearum [J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1964, 2: 203～230
[3]	Stéphane G, Christian B. Ralstonia solanacearum: secrets of a majorpathogen unveiled by analysis of its genome[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2002, 3 ( 3 ) : 111～118
[4]	Cook D,Barlow E, Sequeira L. Genetic diversity of Pseudom onas solanacearum: detection of restriction fragment length polymorphismswith DNA p robes that specify virulence and the hypersensitive response[J]. Mol Plant2Microbe Interact, 1989, 2: 113～121
[5]	Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, et al. Proposal of burkholderiagen. nov. andtransfer of seven species of the genus Pseudom onas homology groupⅡto the new genus. with the type species B urkholderia cepacia ( Palleroni and Holmes1981) comb. nov. [J]. Journal ofMicrobiology andImmunology, 1992, 36: 1 251～1 275
[6]	Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y. Validation of the published names and newcombinations p reviously effectively published outside the IJSB [J].International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1996, 46: 625～626
[7]	吴清平,梁子超. 桉树青枯病病原鉴定和致病力测定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1988, 9 (3) : 59～67
[8]	林雪坚,吴光金,石明旺,等. 桉树青枯病病原菌的研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 1993, 20 (2) : 6～10
[9]	Dianese J C,DristigM C G, Cruz A P, et al. Suscep tibility to wiltassociated with Pseudom om as solanacearum among six species of Eucalyptus growing in equatorial Brazil[J]. Australian Plant Pathology,1990, 19: 71～76
[10]	Coutinho T A, Roux J, Riedel K H, et al. First reportot bacterialwilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum on eucalyp ts in South Africa[J]. Journal of Forest Pathology, 2000, 30 (4) : 205～210
[11]	Roux J, WingfieldM J, Coutinho TA. et al. Diseases of PlantationEucalyptus in the Republic of Congo [J]. South African Journal ofScience, 2000, 96 (8) : 454～456
[12]	吴光金,林雪坚,李冬,等. 桉树青枯病流行区病菌小种和生物型的鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24 (1) : 27～29
[13]	BonasU. Hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria [J]. Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, 1994, 192: 79～98
[14]	Coburn J. Pseudom onas aeruginosa exoenzyme S[J]. Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, 1992, 175: 133～143
[15]	He S Y, Huang H C, A Collmer. Pseudom onas syringae pv. syringae harp inp ss: a p rotein that is secreted via the hrp pathway and elicits the hypersensitive response in p lants [J]. Cell, 1993, 73:1 255～1 266
[16]	Wei ZM, R J Laby, Zumoff C H et al. Harp in, elicitor of the hypersensitive response p roduced by the p lant pathogen Erw inia am ylovora [J]. Science, 1992, 257: 85～88
[17]	Flor H H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concep t [J]. AnnualReview of Phytopathology, 1971, 9: 275～296
[18]	Akiew E. Trevorrow P R. Management of bacterial wilt of tobacco[A]. In: Hayward A C, Hartman G L. BacterialWilt the Diseaseand Its Causative Agent. Pseudom onas solanacearum [M]. CAB Interational. Wallingford, 1994: 179～198
[19]	Hodges C S, Geary T F, Cordell C E. The occurrence of D iaporthecubensis on Eucalyptus in Florida, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico [J].Plant Disease Reporter, 1979, 63: 216～220
[20]	Lee S S. Pathology of trop ical hardwood p lantations in South-eastAsia[J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2003, 33 ( 3 ) :321～335
[21]	Roux J, Coutinho T A, Mujuni Byabashaija D, et al. Diseases ofp lantation Eucalyptus in Uganda [J]. South African Journal of Science, 2001, 97 (1、2) : 16～18
[22]	曹季丹. 巴西柳桉、巨桉青枯病调查初报[J]. 广西林业科技,1982 (4) : 30～31
[23]	李伟东. 桉树青枯病在海南发病现状及防治措施[J]. 海南林业科技, 1992 (3) : 21～22
[24]	Wu Q P, Liang Z C. Identification and pathogenic tests of the causal organism of the bacterialwilt of Eucalyptus [J]. Journal of ChinaAgricultural University, 1988a, 9: 59～67
[25]	弓明钦,陈羽,王凤珍,等. 外生菌根对桉树青枯病的防治效应[J]. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12 (4) : 339～345
[26]	Grégoire N, JeanMM, Jean B. Congo: rapport de pays pour la conference technique internationale de la FAO sur les ressources phytogenetiques
[27]	张民兴,吴光金,林雪坚,等. 桉树青枯病发病规律的研究[J].中南林学院学报, 1996, 16 (2) : 28～32
[28]	Berga Lemaga, Siriri1 D, Ebanyat P. Effect of soil amendments onbacterialwilt incidence and yield of potatoes in southwestern Uganda[J]. African Crop Science Journal, 2001, 9 (1) : 267～278
[29]	Giller K E, Cadish G, Ehaliotis C, et al. Building soil nitrogencap ital in Africa[A]. In: Buresh R J, Sanchez P A, Calhoun F.Rep lenishing Soil Fertility in Africa[M], Soil Science Society ofAmerica Special Publication No. 51 MadisonWisconsin, USA, 1997:151～192
[30]	施仲美,奚富生,何贵整,等. 桉树品系对青枯病抗性及其稳定性的研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2000 (3) : 1～6
[31]	沈文生, 黄乃秀. 桉树抗青枯病的筛选技术[J]. 广西植保,2000, 13 (4) : 34～36
[32]	吴光金,林雪坚,石明旺,等,桉树抗青枯病树种和无性系的鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003, 23 (4) : 32～34
[33]	何学友. 我国林木青枯病研究概况[J]. 森林病虫通讯, 1997(1) : 43～46
[34]	Ran L X. Supp ression of BacterialWilt in Eucalyptus and BacterialSpeck in A rabidopsis by Fluorescent Pseudom onas spp. Strains: Conditions and Mechanisms [M]. Utrecht University, Utrecht. TheNetherlands ISBN: 90-393-3118-9, 2002: 1～142
[35]	董春,范怀忠. 植物青枯病菌细菌素的产生、性质及其利用[J].微生物通报, 2000, 27 (4) : 302～304
[36]	弓明钦,陈羽,王凤珍. AM菌根化的两种桉树苗对青枯病的抗性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (4) : 441～446
[37]	Molina R,Massicotte H, Trappe JM. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community ecological consequences and p ractical imp lications [A]. In: Allen M F. Mycorrhizal Functioning andIntegrative Plant Fungal Process [C]. NewYork: Chapman andHall, 1992: 357～423
[38]	冉隆贤,谷文众,吴光金. 水杨酸诱导桉树抗青枯病的作用及相关酶活性变化[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (1) : 12～18
[39]	康耀卫,毛国璋,吕常胜. 利用转座子Tn5诱变植物青枯菌获得胞外蛋白分泌缺失突变株[J]. 植物保护学报, 1995, 22 ( 3 ) :287～288
[40]	张景宁,张清杰,黄自然,等. 柞蚕杀菌肽对桉树青枯病假单胞杆菌的杀菌作用[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1995, 16 (1) : 97～102
[41]	邵志芳,陈伟元,罗焕亮,等. 柞蚕抗菌肽D基因转入桉树培育抗青枯病株系的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38 (2) : 92～98

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3407) PDF downloads(1841) Cited by()

Proportional views

Advances in Research on Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ra lston iasolanacea rum in Euca lyptus spp. in China

1. China Eucalyp t Research Center, Zhanjiang　524022, Guangdong, China

2. Yongan Branch of China Eucalyp t Research Center, Yongan　366000, Fujian, China

Received Date: 2005-12-23

Abstract: Bacterialwilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is a p rimary disease to Eucalyptus. The occurrence in Eucalyptus has brought great damages in south p rovinces of China. This paper reviewed the advancement involved inRalstonia solanacearum colony characters, the symp tom and characteristics of the wilt, the mechanism of pathogenesisinduced by the bacteria and resistance exp ressed by the host trees, and the variations in resistance among tree species, clones and virulence among pathogen isolates, and the host-pathogen interactions. The currentwilt controlmeasures and some important aspects of research p roposed for the future were suggested.

HTML

Reference (41)

[1]	[R]. Leipzig, Germen, 1996: 1～52
[2]	Buddenhagen IW, Kelman A. Biological and physiological aspects ofbacterial wilt caused by Pseudom onas solanacearum [J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 1964, 2: 203～230
[3]	Stéphane G, Christian B. Ralstonia solanacearum: secrets of a majorpathogen unveiled by analysis of its genome[J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2002, 3 ( 3 ) : 111～118
[4]	Cook D,Barlow E, Sequeira L. Genetic diversity of Pseudom onas solanacearum: detection of restriction fragment length polymorphismswith DNA p robes that specify virulence and the hypersensitive response[J]. Mol Plant2Microbe Interact, 1989, 2: 113～121
[5]	Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, et al. Proposal of burkholderiagen. nov. andtransfer of seven species of the genus Pseudom onas homology groupⅡto the new genus. with the type species B urkholderia cepacia ( Palleroni and Holmes1981) comb. nov. [J]. Journal ofMicrobiology andImmunology, 1992, 36: 1 251～1 275
[6]	Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y. Validation of the published names and newcombinations p reviously effectively published outside the IJSB [J].International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1996, 46: 625～626
[7]	吴清平,梁子超. 桉树青枯病病原鉴定和致病力测定[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1988, 9 (3) : 59～67
[8]	林雪坚,吴光金,石明旺,等. 桉树青枯病病原菌的研究[J]. 湖南林业科技, 1993, 20 (2) : 6～10
[9]	Dianese J C,DristigM C G, Cruz A P, et al. Suscep tibility to wiltassociated with Pseudom om as solanacearum among six species of Eucalyptus growing in equatorial Brazil[J]. Australian Plant Pathology,1990, 19: 71～76
[10]	Coutinho T A, Roux J, Riedel K H, et al. First reportot bacterialwilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum on eucalyp ts in South Africa[J]. Journal of Forest Pathology, 2000, 30 (4) : 205～210
[11]	Roux J, WingfieldM J, Coutinho TA. et al. Diseases of PlantationEucalyptus in the Republic of Congo [J]. South African Journal ofScience, 2000, 96 (8) : 454～456
[12]	吴光金,林雪坚,李冬,等. 桉树青枯病流行区病菌小种和生物型的鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2004, 24 (1) : 27～29
[13]	BonasU. Hrp genes of phytopathogenic bacteria [J]. Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, 1994, 192: 79～98
[14]	Coburn J. Pseudom onas aeruginosa exoenzyme S[J]. Current Topics inMicrobiology and Immunology, 1992, 175: 133～143
[15]	He S Y, Huang H C, A Collmer. Pseudom onas syringae pv. syringae harp inp ss: a p rotein that is secreted via the hrp pathway and elicits the hypersensitive response in p lants [J]. Cell, 1993, 73:1 255～1 266
[16]	Wei ZM, R J Laby, Zumoff C H et al. Harp in, elicitor of the hypersensitive response p roduced by the p lant pathogen Erw inia am ylovora [J]. Science, 1992, 257: 85～88
[17]	Flor H H. Current status of the gene-for-gene concep t [J]. AnnualReview of Phytopathology, 1971, 9: 275～296
[18]	Akiew E. Trevorrow P R. Management of bacterial wilt of tobacco[A]. In: Hayward A C, Hartman G L. BacterialWilt the Diseaseand Its Causative Agent. Pseudom onas solanacearum [M]. CAB Interational. Wallingford, 1994: 179～198
[19]	Hodges C S, Geary T F, Cordell C E. The occurrence of D iaporthecubensis on Eucalyptus in Florida, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico [J].Plant Disease Reporter, 1979, 63: 216～220
[20]	Lee S S. Pathology of trop ical hardwood p lantations in South-eastAsia[J]. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 2003, 33 ( 3 ) :321～335
[21]	Roux J, Coutinho T A, Mujuni Byabashaija D, et al. Diseases ofp lantation Eucalyptus in Uganda [J]. South African Journal of Science, 2001, 97 (1、2) : 16～18
[22]	曹季丹. 巴西柳桉、巨桉青枯病调查初报[J]. 广西林业科技,1982 (4) : 30～31
[23]	李伟东. 桉树青枯病在海南发病现状及防治措施[J]. 海南林业科技, 1992 (3) : 21～22
[24]	Wu Q P, Liang Z C. Identification and pathogenic tests of the causal organism of the bacterialwilt of Eucalyptus [J]. Journal of ChinaAgricultural University, 1988a, 9: 59～67
[25]	弓明钦,陈羽,王凤珍,等. 外生菌根对桉树青枯病的防治效应[J]. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12 (4) : 339～345
[26]	Grégoire N, JeanMM, Jean B. Congo: rapport de pays pour la conference technique internationale de la FAO sur les ressources phytogenetiques
[27]	张民兴,吴光金,林雪坚,等. 桉树青枯病发病规律的研究[J].中南林学院学报, 1996, 16 (2) : 28～32
[28]	Berga Lemaga, Siriri1 D, Ebanyat P. Effect of soil amendments onbacterialwilt incidence and yield of potatoes in southwestern Uganda[J]. African Crop Science Journal, 2001, 9 (1) : 267～278
[29]	Giller K E, Cadish G, Ehaliotis C, et al. Building soil nitrogencap ital in Africa[A]. In: Buresh R J, Sanchez P A, Calhoun F.Rep lenishing Soil Fertility in Africa[M], Soil Science Society ofAmerica Special Publication No. 51 MadisonWisconsin, USA, 1997:151～192
[30]	施仲美,奚富生,何贵整,等. 桉树品系对青枯病抗性及其稳定性的研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2000 (3) : 1～6
[31]	沈文生, 黄乃秀. 桉树抗青枯病的筛选技术[J]. 广西植保,2000, 13 (4) : 34～36
[32]	吴光金,林雪坚,石明旺,等,桉树抗青枯病树种和无性系的鉴定[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003, 23 (4) : 32～34
[33]	何学友. 我国林木青枯病研究概况[J]. 森林病虫通讯, 1997(1) : 43～46
[34]	Ran L X. Supp ression of BacterialWilt in Eucalyptus and BacterialSpeck in A rabidopsis by Fluorescent Pseudom onas spp. Strains: Conditions and Mechanisms [M]. Utrecht University, Utrecht. TheNetherlands ISBN: 90-393-3118-9, 2002: 1～142
[35]	董春,范怀忠. 植物青枯病菌细菌素的产生、性质及其利用[J].微生物通报, 2000, 27 (4) : 302～304
[36]	弓明钦,陈羽,王凤珍. AM菌根化的两种桉树苗对青枯病的抗性研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (4) : 441～446
[37]	Molina R,Massicotte H, Trappe JM. Specificity phenomena in mycorrhizal symbioses: community ecological consequences and p ractical imp lications [A]. In: Allen M F. Mycorrhizal Functioning andIntegrative Plant Fungal Process [C]. NewYork: Chapman andHall, 1992: 357～423
[38]	冉隆贤,谷文众,吴光金. 水杨酸诱导桉树抗青枯病的作用及相关酶活性变化[J]. 林业科学研究, 2004, 17 (1) : 12～18
[39]	康耀卫,毛国璋,吕常胜. 利用转座子Tn5诱变植物青枯菌获得胞外蛋白分泌缺失突变株[J]. 植物保护学报, 1995, 22 ( 3 ) :287～288
[40]	张景宁,张清杰,黄自然,等. 柞蚕杀菌肽对桉树青枯病假单胞杆菌的杀菌作用[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 1995, 16 (1) : 97～102
[41]	邵志芳,陈伟元,罗焕亮,等. 柞蚕抗菌肽D基因转入桉树培育抗青枯病株系的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38 (2) : 92～98

Advances in Research on Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ra lston iasolanacea rum in Euca lyptus spp. in China

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Advances in Research on Bacterial Wilt Caused by Ra lston iasolanacea rum in Euca lyptus spp. in China

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content