Econom ic Ana lysis of Euca lypt Planta tion with D ifferent In itia l Spac ing

CHEN Shao-xiong; LI Zhi-hui; LI Tian-hui; ZHOU Guo-fu; WU Zhi-hua; ZHOU Qun-ying

The spacing trial with 5 treatments ( 1 ) 2 222 tree ·hm-2 , ( 2 ) 1 667 tree ·hm-2 , ( 3 ) 1 250 tree ·hm-2 , (4) 883 tree·hm-2 and (5) 667 tree·hm-2was established at Guangxi Dongmen Forest Farm in 1993, thegrowth data were collected up to 12 years old and calculated CA I, MA I, Volume with different top diameter, NPVand IRR. The results showed that the volume growth of 5 spacings were high significant up to 6. 3 yrs, not significant from 8. 3 yrs. The age of quantitative maturity of spacing 2 222 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 and 1 250 tree·hm-2 was 6 yrs, 6. 5 yrs for spacing 883 tree·hm-2 and 7 yrs for spacing 667 tree·hm-2. The denser the initial spacingwas, the more the amount of small diameter timber and the less the big diameter timber. The harvest rotations of spacing 2 222 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 , 1 250 tree·hm-2 , 883 tree·hm-2 and 667 tree·hm-2were 6 yrs, 7 yrs, 7 yrs, 7 yrs and 8 yrs respectively, the NPV were 17 661、18 457、22 257、24 755 and 24 007 RMB·hm-2 respectively and IRR were 56%, 50%, 55% , 58% and 51% respectively. Spacing 883 tree·hm-2 had themost NPV and IRR among the 5 spacing treatments, the rest in the order from high to low were 667 tree·hm-2 ,1 250 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 and 2 222 tree·hm-2.

1. Central South University of Forestry and Science, Changsha　410004, Hu’nan, China

2. China Eucalyp t Research Center, Zhanjiang　524022, Guangdong, China

3. Guangxi Dongmen Forest Farm, Fusui　532108, Guangxi, China

Received Date: 2007-04-20

Abstract: The spacing trial with 5 treatments ( 1 ) 2 222 tree ·hm-2 , ( 2 ) 1 667 tree ·hm-2 , ( 3 ) 1 250 tree ·hm-2 , (4) 883 tree·hm-2 and (5) 667 tree·hm-2was established at Guangxi Dongmen Forest Farm in 1993, thegrowth data were collected up to 12 years old and calculated CA I, MA I, Volume with different top diameter, NPVand IRR. The results showed that the volume growth of 5 spacings were high significant up to 6. 3 yrs, not significant from 8. 3 yrs. The age of quantitative maturity of spacing 2 222 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 and 1 250 tree·hm-2 was 6 yrs, 6. 5 yrs for spacing 883 tree·hm-2 and 7 yrs for spacing 667 tree·hm-2. The denser the initial spacingwas, the more the amount of small diameter timber and the less the big diameter timber. The harvest rotations of spacing 2 222 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 , 1 250 tree·hm-2 , 883 tree·hm-2 and 667 tree·hm-2were 6 yrs, 7 yrs, 7 yrs, 7 yrs and 8 yrs respectively, the NPV were 17 661、18 457、22 257、24 755 and 24 007 RMB·hm-2 respectively and IRR were 56%, 50%, 55% , 58% and 51% respectively. Spacing 883 tree·hm-2 had themost NPV and IRR among the 5 spacing treatments, the rest in the order from high to low were 667 tree·hm-2 ,1 250 tree·hm-2 , 1 667 tree·hm-2 and 2 222 tree·hm-2.

HTML

Reference (15)

[1]	祁述雄. 中国桉树[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2002
[2]	王辉杨. 不同林地清理方式和造林密度对尾巨桉生长的影响分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2007, 34 (3) : 9 - 12
[3]	张顺恒,蒋家淡,蔡明安,等. 桉树短周期工业原料林适宜造林密度的研究[J]. 福建林业科技, 2000, 27 (2) : 26 - 29
[4]	黄宝灵,吕成群,蒙钰钗,等. 不同造林密度对尾叶桉生长、产量及材性影响的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36 (1) : 81 - 90
[5]	邱文金. 闽西山地巨尾桉不同造林密度试验[J]. 福建林业科技,2006, 33 (2) : 123 - 125
[6]	盛炜彤. 杉木林的密度管理与长期生产力研究[J]. 林业科学,2001, 37 (5) : 2 - 9
[7]	盛炜彤. 不同密度杉木人工林林下植被发育与演替的定位研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14 (5) : 463 - 471
[8]	童书振,盛炜彤,张建国. 杉木林分密度效应研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15 (1) : 66 - 75
[9]	陈少雄,杨建林,周国福. 不同栽培措施对尾巨桉生长的影响及经济效益分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 1999, 12 (4) : 357 - 362
[10]	陈少雄,周国福,林义辉. 尾巨桉纸浆材人工林轮伐期研究[J].林业科学研究, 2002, 15 (4) : 394 - 398
[11]	祁述雄,王洪峰,文应乾. 桉树栽培实用技术[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 2006
[12]	孟宪宇. 测树学[M]. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1999
[13]	陈振生,傅锋,彭家昆,等. 速丰桉林分群体各材种出材量的初步测定[J]. 中国林业, 2006, 5B: 47
[14]	克拉特J L,弗尔森J C,皮纳尔L V,等. 用材林经理学———定量方法[M]. 范济洲,董乃均,于政中,等,译. 北京:中国林业出版社, 1987
[15]	盛炜彤,惠刚盈,张守攻,等. 杉木人工林优化栽培模式[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 2004

Econom ic Ana lysis of Euca lypt Planta tion with D ifferent In itia l Spac ing

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views