A Prelim inary Study on L itter Fa lls of Six Kinds ofPlanta tions in the Tropica l South Asia

LU Li-hua; JIA Hong-yan; HE Ri-ming; LI Ji-liang; QIN Shu-yuan

Volume 21 Issue 3

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2008 > 21(3): 346-352

Citation:

A Prelim inary Study on L itter Fa lls of Six Kinds ofPlanta tions in the Tropica l South Asia

1.
Experimental Center of Trop ical Forestry, CAF, Pingxiang　532600, Guangxi, China
2.
Forestry Bureau of Leye County, Guangxi, Leye　533200, Guangxi, China

Received Date: 2007-08-01

Abstract

The amount and rhythm of litter falls inM ytilaria laosensis, B etu la a lnoides, Castanopsis hystrix, M icheliam acclurei, Pinus m assoniana, and Cunningham ia lanceola ta p lantations located at Experimental Center of Trop icalForestry, CAF, were studied. The results showed that there existed different dynamic change and litter fall amountfor different tree p lantation. Among 6 stands, M ytilaria laosensis had the most leaf and miscellaneous litter falls,which were 4 748. 23 and 1 881. 07 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 , and B etula alnoides had the lowest, which were 2 641. 32 and153. 88 kg·hm-2 ·a-1. Pinusm assoniana had the most leaf litter fall, which was 902. 94 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 , whileCunningham ia lanceolata the lowest, which were 149. 93 kg·hm-2 ·a-1. For annual total litter fall amount,M ytilaria laosensis was the highest (7 095. 76 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 ) and B etula alnoides the lowest (3 309. 05 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 ). The annual total litter fall amounts of Castanopsis hystrix, M ichelia m acclurei, Pinusm asson iana, andCunningham ia lanceolata were similar, ranged between 5 555. 61 - 5 864. 87 kg·hm-2 ·a-1. The ANOVA resultsof the annual total litter fall amount showed that there existed extremely significant differences among tree species.By multip le comparisons, it was showed that there existed extremely significant difference in annual total litter fall amount betweenM y tila ria laosensis and the other 5 species, between Castanopsis hystrix, Cunn ingham ia lanceolataand B etula alnoides and M ichelia m acclurei and Pinus m asson iana, and between M ichelia m acclu rei, Pinusm assoniana and B etula alnoides.
- trop ical South Asia,
- p lantation,
- litter fall amount,
- litter falling rhythm

References

[1]	盛炜彤. 杉木人工林地力衰退研究[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1993: 10 - 37
[2]	俞新妥. 论杉木人工林的回归—从杉木林地力衰退的因果谈杉木林的可持续经营[J]. 世界林业研究, 1999, 12 (5) : 15 - 19
[3]	刘　芳. 杉木光皮桦纯林及混交林生物量[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2002, 19 (2) : 143 - 147
[4]	卢立华,蔡道雄,何日明,等. 桂西南不同树种人工林评价研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 (2) : 145 - 150
[5]	吴志东, 彭福泉,车玉萍,等. 我国南亚热带几种人工林的生物循环特点及其对土壤影响[J]. 土壤学报, 1990, 27 ( 3 ) :251 - 259
[6]	姚丰平,吴军寿,姚理武,等. 庆元林场阔叶林主要类型生物量测定及其评价[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2003, 27 (3) : 74 - 78
[7]	李建民,陈存及,潘标志,等. 南方林区速生乡土阔叶树种的评价与筛选[J]. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16 (6) : 777 - 782
[8]	薛　立,赖日石,陈红跃,等. 不同阔叶树种的生长及其对赤红壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40 (5) : 795 - 799
[9]	邹　碧,李志安,丁永祯,等. 南亚热带4种人工林凋落物动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26 (3) : 715 - 721
[10]	李志安,林永标,彭少麟. 华南五种人工林凋落物养分及其转移[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11 (3) : 321 - 326
[11]	张　华, 肖水清,曹展波,等. 25种优良阔叶树种育苗技术研究[J]. 江西林业科技, 2000 (6) : 1 - 3
[12]	刘光正, 曹展波,肖水清,等. 江西9个优良阔叶树种栽培试验[J]. 林业科技开发, 2000 (4) : 17 - 20
[13]	李夷荔,林文莲. 杉木米老排混交林水源涵养功能的研究[J].福建水土保持, 2001, 13 (4) : 43 - 46
[14]	廖利平,马越强,汪思龙,等. 杉木与主要阔叶造林树种叶凋落物的混合分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24 (1) : 27 - 33
[15]	李丽红. 杉木观光木混交林生物产量结构特征[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2003, 23 (4) : 297 - 300
[16]	Warning R H, SchlesingerW H. Forest ecosystems: concep ts andmanagement[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 181 - 210
[17]	Jordan C F. The nutrient balance of an Amazonia rain forest[J].Ecology, 1982, 61: 14 - 18
[18]	Janzen H H. Carbon cycling in earth systems2a soil science perspective [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004,104: 399 - 417
[19]	Quideau S A, Chadwick O A, Benesi A, et al. Adirect link between forest vegetation type and soil organicmatter composition[J].Geoderma, 2001, 104: 41 - 60
[20]	Arunachalam A, Arunachalam KM, Pandey H N, et al. Fine litterfall and nutrient dynamics during forest regrowth in the humidsubtrop ics of north-eastern India [J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 1998,110: 209 - 219
[21]	张清海,叶功富,林益明. 海岸沙地木麻黄人工林凋落物归还量及其热值动态研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 ( 5 ) :600 - 605
[22]	温远光,韦盛章,秦武明. 杉木人工林凋落物动态及其与气候因素的相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 1990, 10 (4) : 367 - 372
[23]	方　晰,田大伦,项文化. 杉木人工林凋落物量及其分解过程中碳的释放率[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2005, 25 (6) : 12 - 16
[24]	史振华,何宗明,谢建闽,等. 5～7年生杉木幼林凋落物数量与月动态[J]. 福建农林大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 35 ( 3) : 278- 282
[25]	姚瑞玲,丁贵杰,王　胤. 不同密度马尾松人工林凋落物及养分归还量的年变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版,2006, 30 (5) : 83 - 86
[26]	林　波,刘　庆,吴　彦,等. 森林凋落物研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23 (1) : 60 - 64
[27]	温远光,黄承标,梁宏温. 里骆林区杉木生态物候学的初步研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 1987, 6 (6) : 10 - 16
[28]	Arunachalam A,Arunachalam KM, Pandey H N, et al. Fine litterfalland nutrient dynamics during forest regrowth in the humid subtropics of north-eastern India[J]. Forest EcolManag, 1998, 110: 209 -219

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3207) PDF downloads(1423) Cited by()

Proportional views

A Prelim inary Study on L itter Fa lls of Six Kinds ofPlanta tions in the Tropica l South Asia

1. Experimental Center of Trop ical Forestry, CAF, Pingxiang　532600, Guangxi, China

2. Forestry Bureau of Leye County, Guangxi, Leye　533200, Guangxi, China

Received Date: 2007-08-01

Abstract: The amount and rhythm of litter falls inM ytilaria laosensis, B etu la a lnoides, Castanopsis hystrix, M icheliam acclurei, Pinus m assoniana, and Cunningham ia lanceola ta p lantations located at Experimental Center of Trop icalForestry, CAF, were studied. The results showed that there existed different dynamic change and litter fall amountfor different tree p lantation. Among 6 stands, M ytilaria laosensis had the most leaf and miscellaneous litter falls,which were 4 748. 23 and 1 881. 07 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 , and B etula alnoides had the lowest, which were 2 641. 32 and153. 88 kg·hm-2 ·a-1. Pinusm assoniana had the most leaf litter fall, which was 902. 94 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 , whileCunningham ia lanceolata the lowest, which were 149. 93 kg·hm-2 ·a-1. For annual total litter fall amount,M ytilaria laosensis was the highest (7 095. 76 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 ) and B etula alnoides the lowest (3 309. 05 kg·hm-2 ·a-1 ). The annual total litter fall amounts of Castanopsis hystrix, M ichelia m acclurei, Pinusm asson iana, andCunningham ia lanceolata were similar, ranged between 5 555. 61 - 5 864. 87 kg·hm-2 ·a-1. The ANOVA resultsof the annual total litter fall amount showed that there existed extremely significant differences among tree species.By multip le comparisons, it was showed that there existed extremely significant difference in annual total litter fall amount betweenM y tila ria laosensis and the other 5 species, between Castanopsis hystrix, Cunn ingham ia lanceolataand B etula alnoides and M ichelia m acclurei and Pinus m asson iana, and between M ichelia m acclu rei, Pinusm assoniana and B etula alnoides.

HTML

Reference (28)

[1]	盛炜彤. 杉木人工林地力衰退研究[M]. 北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1993: 10 - 37
[2]	俞新妥. 论杉木人工林的回归—从杉木林地力衰退的因果谈杉木林的可持续经营[J]. 世界林业研究, 1999, 12 (5) : 15 - 19
[3]	刘　芳. 杉木光皮桦纯林及混交林生物量[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2002, 19 (2) : 143 - 147
[4]	卢立华,蔡道雄,何日明,等. 桂西南不同树种人工林评价研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 (2) : 145 - 150
[5]	吴志东, 彭福泉,车玉萍,等. 我国南亚热带几种人工林的生物循环特点及其对土壤影响[J]. 土壤学报, 1990, 27 ( 3 ) :251 - 259
[6]	姚丰平,吴军寿,姚理武,等. 庆元林场阔叶林主要类型生物量测定及其评价[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2003, 27 (3) : 74 - 78
[7]	李建民,陈存及,潘标志,等. 南方林区速生乡土阔叶树种的评价与筛选[J]. 林业科学研究, 2003, 16 (6) : 777 - 782
[8]	薛　立,赖日石,陈红跃,等. 不同阔叶树种的生长及其对赤红壤肥力的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40 (5) : 795 - 799
[9]	邹　碧,李志安,丁永祯,等. 南亚热带4种人工林凋落物动态特征[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26 (3) : 715 - 721
[10]	李志安,林永标,彭少麟. 华南五种人工林凋落物养分及其转移[J]. 应用生态学报, 2000, 11 (3) : 321 - 326
[11]	张　华, 肖水清,曹展波,等. 25种优良阔叶树种育苗技术研究[J]. 江西林业科技, 2000 (6) : 1 - 3
[12]	刘光正, 曹展波,肖水清,等. 江西9个优良阔叶树种栽培试验[J]. 林业科技开发, 2000 (4) : 17 - 20
[13]	李夷荔,林文莲. 杉木米老排混交林水源涵养功能的研究[J].福建水土保持, 2001, 13 (4) : 43 - 46
[14]	廖利平,马越强,汪思龙,等. 杉木与主要阔叶造林树种叶凋落物的混合分解[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24 (1) : 27 - 33
[15]	李丽红. 杉木观光木混交林生物产量结构特征[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2003, 23 (4) : 297 - 300
[16]	Warning R H, SchlesingerW H. Forest ecosystems: concep ts andmanagement[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1985: 181 - 210
[17]	Jordan C F. The nutrient balance of an Amazonia rain forest[J].Ecology, 1982, 61: 14 - 18
[18]	Janzen H H. Carbon cycling in earth systems2a soil science perspective [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2004,104: 399 - 417
[19]	Quideau S A, Chadwick O A, Benesi A, et al. Adirect link between forest vegetation type and soil organicmatter composition[J].Geoderma, 2001, 104: 41 - 60
[20]	Arunachalam A, Arunachalam KM, Pandey H N, et al. Fine litterfall and nutrient dynamics during forest regrowth in the humidsubtrop ics of north-eastern India [J]. Forest Ecol Manag, 1998,110: 209 - 219
[21]	张清海,叶功富,林益明. 海岸沙地木麻黄人工林凋落物归还量及其热值动态研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19 ( 5 ) :600 - 605
[22]	温远光,韦盛章,秦武明. 杉木人工林凋落物动态及其与气候因素的相关分析[J]. 生态学报, 1990, 10 (4) : 367 - 372
[23]	方　晰,田大伦,项文化. 杉木人工林凋落物量及其分解过程中碳的释放率[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2005, 25 (6) : 12 - 16
[24]	史振华,何宗明,谢建闽,等. 5～7年生杉木幼林凋落物数量与月动态[J]. 福建农林大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 35 ( 3) : 278- 282
[25]	姚瑞玲,丁贵杰,王　胤. 不同密度马尾松人工林凋落物及养分归还量的年变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报: 自然科学版,2006, 30 (5) : 83 - 86
[26]	林　波,刘　庆,吴　彦,等. 森林凋落物研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23 (1) : 60 - 64
[27]	温远光,黄承标,梁宏温. 里骆林区杉木生态物候学的初步研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 1987, 6 (6) : 10 - 16
[28]	Arunachalam A,Arunachalam KM, Pandey H N, et al. Fine litterfalland nutrient dynamics during forest regrowth in the humid subtropics of north-eastern India[J]. Forest EcolManag, 1998, 110: 209 -219

A Prelim inary Study on L itter Fa lls of Six Kinds ofPlanta tions in the Tropica l South Asia

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

A Prelim inary Study on L itter Fa lls of Six Kinds ofPlanta tions in the Tropica l South Asia

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content