Assessment of Forest Function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain based on Improved TOPSIS Method

ZHANG Lian-jin; SUN Chang-zhong; XIN Xue-bing; KONG Qing-yun

Volume 27 Issue 5

Article Contents

Turn off MathJax

Article Navigation > Forest Research > 2014 > 27(5): 644-650

Citation:

Assessment of Forest Function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain based on Improved TOPSIS Method

1.
Forestry Experiment Center of North China, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 102300, China

Received Date: 2014-01-21

Abstract

Based on the principles of scientificity, systematic, relative independence and operability, 16 assessment indices were selected from the six aspects of site conditions, soil conditions, productivity, community structure, resistance and resilience, and an assessment index system of forest function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain was conducted. In the meantime, the standard of assessment indices was determined. Finally, the function status of 23 plots was evaluated by using the improved TOPSIS method. The results showed that among the 23 plots, those in the better, medium and poor function were 6, 10 and 7, respectively, indicating that the function of most of the plots were low, and were badly in need of taking effective action to raise and improve forest function status in order to achieve forest sustainable development of the study area. From the viewpoint of practical effect, it can be concluded that the improved TOPSIS method is scientific, feasible and it can provide references for forest function assessment in Beijing.
- improved TOPSIS method,
- Jiulong Mountain,
- forest function,
- assessment

References

[1]	Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
[2]	Costanza R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
[3]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2010: 1-18.
[4]	Adger N W, Brown K, Cervigni R, et al. Total economic value of forests in Mexico[J]. Ambio, 1995, 24(5): 286-296.
[5]	UK NEA. Th UK national ecosystem assessment technical report: synthesis of the key findings[M]. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, 2011:5-84.
[6]	段晓峰, 许学工. 区域森林生态系统服务功能评价——以山东省为例[J]. 北京大学学报:自然科学版,2006,42(6):751-756.
[7]	王兵,马向前,郭浩,等. 中国杉木林的生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 林业科学,2009,45(4):124-130.
[8]	王兵,任晓旭,胡文. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 林业科学,2011,47(2):145-153.
[9]	白杨,欧阳志云,郑华,等. 海河流域森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(7):2029-2039.
[10]	牛香,宋庆丰,王兵,等. 吉林省森林生态系统服务功能[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2013,41(8):36-41.
[11]	刘勇,李晋昌,杨永刚. 基于生物量因子的山西省森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(9):2699-2706.
[12]	殷鸣放,郑小贤,殷炜达. 森林多功能评价与表达方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2012,40(6):23-26.
[13]	Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications[M]. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg, 1981.
[14]	陈杰,朱丽倩,吴向炜. 改进的TOPSIS在区域水资源可持续利用综合评价中的应用研究[J]. 武汉大学学报:工学版,2008,41(S):303-306.
[15]	张振东,潘妮,梁川. 基于改进TOPSIS的长江黄河源区生态脆弱性评价[J]. 人民长江,2009,40(16):81-84.
[16]	杨东,郑凤娟,潘竟虎,等. 改进的TOPSIS法在土地利用合理性评价中的应用[J]. 土壤通报,2012,43(1):120-124.
[17]	Yu J F, Wang L, Gong X L. Study on the status evaluation of urban road intersections traffic congestion base on AHP-TOPSIS model[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 96: 609-616.
[18]	兰再平. 北京九龙山地区的植被及其对生境类型的指示意义[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学报,1989,13(3):258-269.
[19]	李清河,杨立文,崔丽娟. 北京九龙山封育植被群落变化的研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2002,13(3):323-331.
[20]	于宁楼.九龙山不同森林类型立地长期生产力研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2001.
[21]	仝慧杰. 森林生物量遥感反演建模基础与方法的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2007.
[22]	庄健荣,张志翔. 结构—多样性指数在八达岭地区森林健康评价中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报,2008,24(8):162-166.
[23]	王栋.中国森林火险调查与区划[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,2000.
[24]	Wang T C, Lee H D. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 8980-8985.
[25]	Xu Z S, Zhang X L. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 52(1): 53-64.
[26]	Chang C H, Lin J J, Lin J H, et al. Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37: 4642-4649.
[27]	Yue Z L. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of descision makers with interval numbers[J]. Knowledge-Based System, 2011, 24(1): 146-153.
[28]	胡焕香,佘济云,张敏,等. 基于小班尺度的宁远河流域森林健康评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2013,28(2):182-186.

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Article views(3200) PDF downloads(1362) Cited by()

Proportional views

Assessment of Forest Function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain based on Improved TOPSIS Method

1. Forestry Experiment Center of North China, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 102300, China

Received Date: 2014-01-21

Abstract: Based on the principles of scientificity, systematic, relative independence and operability, 16 assessment indices were selected from the six aspects of site conditions, soil conditions, productivity, community structure, resistance and resilience, and an assessment index system of forest function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain was conducted. In the meantime, the standard of assessment indices was determined. Finally, the function status of 23 plots was evaluated by using the improved TOPSIS method. The results showed that among the 23 plots, those in the better, medium and poor function were 6, 10 and 7, respectively, indicating that the function of most of the plots were low, and were badly in need of taking effective action to raise and improve forest function status in order to achieve forest sustainable development of the study area. From the viewpoint of practical effect, it can be concluded that the improved TOPSIS method is scientific, feasible and it can provide references for forest function assessment in Beijing.

HTML

Reference (28)

[1]	Costanza R, d'Arge R, de Groot R. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
[2]	Costanza R. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed[J]. Biological Conservation, 2008, 141(2): 350-352.
[3]	Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: General Synthesis[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2010: 1-18.
[4]	Adger N W, Brown K, Cervigni R, et al. Total economic value of forests in Mexico[J]. Ambio, 1995, 24(5): 286-296.
[5]	UK NEA. Th UK national ecosystem assessment technical report: synthesis of the key findings[M]. Cambridge: UNEP-WCMC, 2011:5-84.
[6]	段晓峰, 许学工. 区域森林生态系统服务功能评价——以山东省为例[J]. 北京大学学报:自然科学版,2006,42(6):751-756.
[7]	王兵,马向前,郭浩,等. 中国杉木林的生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 林业科学,2009,45(4):124-130.
[8]	王兵,任晓旭,胡文. 中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 林业科学,2011,47(2):145-153.
[9]	白杨,欧阳志云,郑华,等. 海河流域森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(7):2029-2039.
[10]	牛香,宋庆丰,王兵,等. 吉林省森林生态系统服务功能[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2013,41(8):36-41.
[11]	刘勇,李晋昌,杨永刚. 基于生物量因子的山西省森林生态系统服务功能评估[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(9):2699-2706.
[12]	殷鸣放,郑小贤,殷炜达. 森林多功能评价与表达方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2012,40(6):23-26.
[13]	Hwang C L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications[M]. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg, 1981.
[14]	陈杰,朱丽倩,吴向炜. 改进的TOPSIS在区域水资源可持续利用综合评价中的应用研究[J]. 武汉大学学报:工学版,2008,41(S):303-306.
[15]	张振东,潘妮,梁川. 基于改进TOPSIS的长江黄河源区生态脆弱性评价[J]. 人民长江,2009,40(16):81-84.
[16]	杨东,郑凤娟,潘竟虎,等. 改进的TOPSIS法在土地利用合理性评价中的应用[J]. 土壤通报,2012,43(1):120-124.
[17]	Yu J F, Wang L, Gong X L. Study on the status evaluation of urban road intersections traffic congestion base on AHP-TOPSIS model[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 96: 609-616.
[18]	兰再平. 北京九龙山地区的植被及其对生境类型的指示意义[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学报,1989,13(3):258-269.
[19]	李清河,杨立文,崔丽娟. 北京九龙山封育植被群落变化的研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2002,13(3):323-331.
[20]	于宁楼.九龙山不同森林类型立地长期生产力研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2001.
[21]	仝慧杰. 森林生物量遥感反演建模基础与方法的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学,2007.
[22]	庄健荣,张志翔. 结构—多样性指数在八达岭地区森林健康评价中的应用[J]. 中国农学通报,2008,24(8):162-166.
[23]	王栋.中国森林火险调查与区划[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社,2000.
[24]	Wang T C, Lee H D. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36: 8980-8985.
[25]	Xu Z S, Zhang X L. Hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on TOPSIS with incomplete weight information[J]. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 52(1): 53-64.
[26]	Chang C H, Lin J J, Lin J H, et al. Domestic open-end equity mutual fund performance evaluation using extended TOPSIS method with different distance approaches[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37: 4642-4649.
[27]	Yue Z L. An extended TOPSIS for determining weights of descision makers with interval numbers[J]. Knowledge-Based System, 2011, 24(1): 146-153.
[28]	胡焕香,佘济云,张敏,等. 基于小班尺度的宁远河流域森林健康评价研究[J]. 西北林学院学报,2013,28(2):182-186.

Assessment of Forest Function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain based on Improved TOPSIS Method

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views

Assessment of Forest Function in Beijing Jiulong Mountain based on Improved TOPSIS Method

HTML

Catalog

Export File

Citation

Format

Content