Effects of Different Structure of Platycladusorientalis Plantation in Beijing Jiulongshan on Redistribution of Precipitation

WANG Lei; SUN Chang-zhong; ZHOU Bin

[Objective] Based on the precipitation data of 2014 toanalyze quantitatively the law of redistribution of precipitationin mountainous area of North China. [Method] The method of field positioning was used to analyze the rainfall redistribution of Platycladusorientalis plantation with different structure (canopy, under branch height)characteristics. [Result] (1)At the height of 1/2 under branch height, the through rainfalls of stands with canopy density of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 respectively were 181.1, 168.1, and 147.1 mm, the rates of through rainfall were 78.8%, 73.1%, and 64.0%; The total stemflowswere 6.0, 5.9 and 3.9 mm respectively, the rates of stemflowwere 4.2%, 2.6% and 1.7%. The total canopy interceptionswere respectively 39.5, 56.1 and 79.1 mm. The rates of canopy interception were 17.1%, 24.4% and 34.4%. (2) At the height of 1/3 under branch height, the through rainfall of stands with canopy density of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 canopy were 175.6 mm, 154.8 mm, and 136.0 mm, the rates of through rainfall were 76.4%, 67.3%, and 59.2%. The total stemflowswere respectively 8.3, 4.9 and 3.3 mm, the rates of stemflowwere 3.6%, 2.1% and 1.4%. The total canopy interceptionswere respectively 46.2, 70.4 and 90.6 mm. The rates of canopy interception were 20.1%, 30.6% and 39.4%. [Conclusion] (1) At the same under branch height, the difference in through rainfall of P. orientalisplantation with different canopy coverage was not significant. The stemflow between the stands with canopy density of 0.4 and 0.8 showed significant difference, while the difference between the canopy density of 0.4 and 0.6 and between the canopy density of 0.6 and 0.8 were not significant.(2) At the stand with the density of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8, the canopy interception of the stand with crown thickness accounts for 2/3 the tree height were 1.17, 1.25 and 1.14 times that of the stand with crown thickness accounts for 1/2 the tree height. (3) Significant differences in crown interception were found among different canopy density. (4) At the same rainfall intensity, the more the rainfall, the smaller the canopy interception; the longer the interval of rainfall time, the drier the canopy drier and the stronger the interception ability; The lower the branch height, the larger the canopy interception amount and with the increase of the canopy density, the canopy interception increased.

1. Forestry Experiment Center of North China, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 102300, China

2. Beijing World Hazard Preventing Technology Co. LTD, Beijing 100044, China

Received Date: 2015-08-11

Abstract: [Objective] Based on the precipitation data of 2014 toanalyze quantitatively the law of redistribution of precipitationin mountainous area of North China. [Method] The method of field positioning was used to analyze the rainfall redistribution of Platycladusorientalis plantation with different structure (canopy, under branch height)characteristics. [Result] (1)At the height of 1/2 under branch height, the through rainfalls of stands with canopy density of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 respectively were 181.1, 168.1, and 147.1 mm, the rates of through rainfall were 78.8%, 73.1%, and 64.0%; The total stemflowswere 6.0, 5.9 and 3.9 mm respectively, the rates of stemflowwere 4.2%, 2.6% and 1.7%. The total canopy interceptionswere respectively 39.5, 56.1 and 79.1 mm. The rates of canopy interception were 17.1%, 24.4% and 34.4%. (2) At the height of 1/3 under branch height, the through rainfall of stands with canopy density of 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 canopy were 175.6 mm, 154.8 mm, and 136.0 mm, the rates of through rainfall were 76.4%, 67.3%, and 59.2%. The total stemflowswere respectively 8.3, 4.9 and 3.3 mm, the rates of stemflowwere 3.6%, 2.1% and 1.4%. The total canopy interceptionswere respectively 46.2, 70.4 and 90.6 mm. The rates of canopy interception were 20.1%, 30.6% and 39.4%. [Conclusion] (1) At the same under branch height, the difference in through rainfall of P. orientalisplantation with different canopy coverage was not significant. The stemflow between the stands with canopy density of 0.4 and 0.8 showed significant difference, while the difference between the canopy density of 0.4 and 0.6 and between the canopy density of 0.6 and 0.8 were not significant.(2) At the stand with the density of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8, the canopy interception of the stand with crown thickness accounts for 2/3 the tree height were 1.17, 1.25 and 1.14 times that of the stand with crown thickness accounts for 1/2 the tree height. (3) Significant differences in crown interception were found among different canopy density. (4) At the same rainfall intensity, the more the rainfall, the smaller the canopy interception; the longer the interval of rainfall time, the drier the canopy drier and the stronger the interception ability; The lower the branch height, the larger the canopy interception amount and with the increase of the canopy density, the canopy interception increased.

HTML

Reference (17)

[1]	钟剑飞,刘东兰,郑小贤.水源涵养林结构与功能量化研究进展[J].现代农业科学,2009,16(3):110-112.
[2]	Brauman K A,Freyberg D L,Daily G C. Forest structure influences on rainfall partitioning and cloud interception:a comparison of native forest sites in Kona,Hawai'i[J].Agric For Meteorol,2010,150:265-275.
[3]	马雪华,杨茂瑞,胡星弼.亚热带杉木,马尾松人工林水文功能的研究[J].林业科学,1993,29(3):199-206.
[4]	郝帅,张毓涛,刘端,等.不同郁闭度天山云杉林林冠截留量及穿透雨量特征研究[J].干旱区地理,2009,32(6):917-923.
[5]	Herbst M,Roberts J M,Rosier P T W,et al.Measuring and modelling the rainfall interception loss by hedgerows in southern England[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2006,141(2):244-256.
[6]	Llorens P.Gallart F.A simplified method for forest water storage capacity measurement[J].Journal of Hydrology,2000,240:131-144.
[7]	王珍珍,文仕知,杨丽丽.长沙市郊枫香人工林降水再分配及养分动态[J].中南林业科技大学学报:自然科学版,2008,28(2):54-56.
[8]	余新晓,史宇,王贺年,等.森林生态系统水文过程与功能[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[9]	黄志霖,李建新,王玉.太行山侧柏人工林林冠降雨截留及地表径流的研究[J].河南林业科技,2000(2):1-5.
[10]	周彬,韩海荣,康峰峰,等.太岳山不同郁闭度油松人工林降水分配特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(5):1645-1653..
[11]	鲜靖苹,张家洋,胡海波.森林冠层水文研究进展[J].西北林学院学报,2014,29(3):96-104.
[12]	陈书军,陈存根,曹田健,等.降雨特征及小气候对秦岭油松林降雨再分配的影响[J].水科学进展,2013,24(4):513-521.
[13]	田风霞,赵传燕,冯兆东,等.祁连山青海云杉林冠生态水文效应及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2012,32(4):1066-1076.
[14]	隋媛媛,许晓鸥,张瑜,等.东北黑土区水土保持林降雨截留特征分析[J].草业科学,2015,24(6):16-24.
[15]	李晶晶,白岗栓.黄土丘陵沟壑区苹果树冠截留规律[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(2):379-386.
[16]	Teklehanimanot Z,Jarvis P G,Ledger D C. Rainfall interception and boundary layer conductance in relation to tree spacing[J]. Journal of Hydrology,1991,123(3/4):261-278.
[17]	Viville D,Biron P,Biron P,et al.Interception in a mountainous decling spruce stand in the Strengbachcatchmen(Vosges,France)[J].Journal of Hydrology,1993,144(1/4):273-282.

Effects of Different Structure of Platycladusorientalis Plantation in Beijing Jiulongshan on Redistribution of Precipitation

Abstract

References

Proportional views

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Proportional views