Most Viewed
1
1998, 11(1): 58-62.
[Abstract]
[PDF 314KB]2
2020, 33(3): 172-183.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.03.022
[FullText HTML]3
2020, 33(3): 146-155.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.03.019
4
2021, 34(3): 23-36.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.03.003
5
2018, 31(1): 85-93.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.011
6
7
8
2021, 34(4): 149-155.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.04.018
9
2014, 27(2): 219-224.
10
2010, 23(3): 411-416.
11
2009, 22(1).
12
2010, 23(2): 195-201.
13
2021, 34(3): 13-22.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2021.03.002
14
2018, 31(1): 1-14.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2018.01.001
15
16
2003, 16(3): 366-371.
17
2019, 32(3): 1-8.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2019.03.001
18
2012, 25(2): 123-129.
19
2020, 33(1): 11-18.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.01.002
20
2010, 23(2): 278-282.
- First
- Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next
- Last
- Total:5
- To
- Go
Subvmission Guidelines
Peer Review
Reviewer Online
Office Work
Email alert
RSS